H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Richard Fromberg vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-2
Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2002 Adelaide third round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2002* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-0 | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1997* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(4) | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Fromberg | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |