H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 1-1

Richard Fromberg and Tomas Carbonell are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1995 Oporto round of 32 1-6 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Fromberg #38 1-6 6-4 7-5 Tomas Carbonell #74 Match data Jun 15, 1995* R32 Oporto ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Carbonell #83 6-4 3-6 7-5 Richard Fromberg #120 Match data Jul 9, 1992* R32 Swedish Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 283 46.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,663 0 2 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0
22 1992 14–23 37.8% #83 1,636 0 3 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,681 0 3 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,697 0 3 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,671 0 3 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,673 0 4 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,597 0 4 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,632 0 4 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Fromberg Tomas Carbonell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1989 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1993 14 12 26 53.8% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 17 15 32 53.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2000 11 8 19 57.9% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 113 216 47.7% 123 124 247 49.8% 15 21 36 41.7% 6 25 31 19.4% — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/450 of Richard Fromberg's and 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Fromberg Tomas Carbonell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 29/38 5.1 2.9 56.9% 70.5% 47.5% 54.4% 46.4% 60.8% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 33/37 6.2 3.6 55.9% 70.4% 47.0% 62.4% 39.8% 60.1% 38.1% 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2%
23 1993 54/64 8.5 3.9 58.0% 73.3% 48.4% 60.4% 40.6% 62.8% 34.6% 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3%
24 1994 49/53 8.7 4.6 58.9% 73.2% 49.4% 57.8% 42.1% 63.4% 35.5% 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4%
25 1995 33/38 7.2 2.8 56.7% 72.8% 49.6% 60.0% 42.5% 62.9% 36.5% 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8%
26 1996 34/39 7.7 3.0 59.8% 74.6% 48.7% 47.3% 42.4% 64.1% 38.0% 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6%
27 1997 40/44 8.7 5.1 59.9% 75.9% 47.1% 58.1% 38.3% 64.5% 36.3% 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4%
28 1998 50/57 11.1 3.6 59.7% 76.6% 49.0% 60.6% 41.3% 65.5% 37.5% 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0%
29 1999 26/31 11.0 3.9 59.1% 72.8% 49.8% 61.0% 30.5% 63.2% 34.0% 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4%
30 2000 34/38 9.8 3.4 59.6% 72.4% 50.7% 51.9% 49.1% 63.8% 36.9% 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3%
31 2001 9/9 8.0 3.6 58.5% 69.4% 41.2% 45.9% 44.8% 57.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 2/2 4.0 6.0 60.9% 71.8% 34.2% 47.7% 22.5% 57.0% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 393/530 8.5 3.8 58.6% 73.4% 48.5% 57.4% 41.4% 63.1% 36.6% — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Fromberg Tomas Carbonell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40
18 1988 1551 111.4 — — — — +19 — — 46.4% -0.46 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.29 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21
19 1989 1548 118.1 — — — — +34 — — 36.0% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.22 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60
20 1990 1663 138.3 — — — — -70 +70 -25 55.7% +0.45 11–12 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.40 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46
21 1991 1643 133.9 +0.28 +1.30 1.064 51.0% +14 +47 — 48.4% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.91 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.63
22 1992 1637 132.1 -0.58 -0.50 0.954 49.4% +19 +5 — 44.1% -0.28 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.04 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) — -2.85
23 1993 1682 133.8 +1.16 -2.63 0.932 49.1% +27 -9 -121 50.3% +0.05 15–9 (63%) 21–19 (53%) — +0.53 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.61
24 1994 1698 136.2 +1.93 -2.65 0.970 49.9% -30 +46 -86 47.6% -0.14 10–10 (50%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.37 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.48
25 1995 1672 142.3 +1.50 -1.49 0.983 49.6% -41 +85 — 49.4% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.88 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.63
26 1996 1633 136.1 +2.11 -0.57 1.060 50.8% +20 +51 — 47.4% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.93 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.06
27 1997 1674 134.6 +2.54 -1.42 1.022 50.5% -72 +76 -91 44.2% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–17 (35%) — -1.35 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.23
28 1998 1598 134.8 +3.39 -0.75 1.089 51.6% -4 +127 -33 47.4% +0.18 10–14 (42%) 8–24 (25%) — +1.54 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.37
29 1999 1667 126.4 +1.31 -2.30 0.922 49.0% -31 +33 -90 49.4% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.28 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
30 2000 1633 131.8 +1.64 -0.83 1.022 50.3% +93 -40 -74 49.1% +0.05 9–11 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25
31 2001 1502 115.9 -0.76 -1.82 0.772 45.4% +142 +20 — 18.2% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1486 104.4 +0.20 -1.39 0.783 45.5% — — — 28.6% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1823 139.4 +1.58 -1.32 0.994 50.0% +3 +49 -67 47.5% -0.08 92–106 (46%) 124–143 (46%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.