H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Richard Fromberg vs Tommy Ho H2H: 1-2

Tommy Ho holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Ho leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Ho won the 1995 Miami Open round of 64 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Fromberg
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tommy Ho
USA Age 53 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Ho #115 7-6(3) 6-3 Richard Fromberg #43 Match data Mar 15, 1995* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Ho #120 7-5 6-2 Richard Fromberg #74 Match data Apr 15, 1993* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Richard Fromberg #65 5-7 6-2 6-4 Tommy Ho #135 Match data Feb 10, 1993* R64 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Fromberg #997 #24 1,214 1,823 247 283 46.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tommy Ho #1,306 #85 522 1,622 36 66 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Fromberg Tommy Ho
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–4 20.0% #625 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–5 0.0% #641 1,444 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 2–2 50.0% #182 1,490 0 0
18 1988 5–5 50.0% #103 1,550 0 0 1991 2–4 33.3% #224 1,491 0 0
19 1989 7–13 35.0% #126 1,548 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #154 1,561 0 0
20 1990 29–21 58.0% #32 1,663 0 2 1993 7–14 33.3% #132 1,553 0 0
21 1991 18–20 47.4% #95 1,643 0 3 1994 2–10 16.7% #165 1,484 0 0
22 1992 14–23 37.8% #83 1,636 0 3 1995 14–16 46.7% #127 1,562 0 0
23 1993 34–30 53.1% #40 1,681 0 3 1996 1–2 33.3% #482 1,556 0 0
24 1994 25–28 47.2% #58 1,697 0 3 1997 3–4 42.9% #250 1,560 0 0
25 1995 18–20 47.4% #85 1,671 0 3 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,546 0 0
26 1996 18–21 46.2% #76 1,633 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1997 19–25 43.2% #77 1,673 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1998 26–31 45.6% #40 1,597 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1999 15–16 48.4% #78 1,666 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2000 18–20 47.4% #84 1,632 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2001 1–8 11.1% #309 1,502 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #727 1,486 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Fromberg Tommy Ho
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1989 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1993 14 12 26 53.8% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 17 15 32 53.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 14 13 27 51.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 11 8 19 57.9% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 113 216 47.7% 123 124 247 49.8% 15 21 36 41.7% 6 25 31 19.4% — 22 45 67 32.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 12 22 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 393/450 of Richard Fromberg's and 77/88 of Tommy Ho's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Fromberg Tommy Ho
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 4/6 3.8 4.0 60.8% 67.1% 54.3% 60.6% 59.4% 61.7% 34.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 7/8 5.9 2.7 66.3% 72.4% 50.0% 54.5% 47.7% 64.8% 38.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 18/21 3.4 3.6 61.8% 67.6% 49.4% 56.5% 32.0% 60.3% 33.5%
21 1991 29/38 5.1 2.9 56.9% 70.5% 47.5% 54.4% 46.4% 60.8% 41.7% 1994 12/12 2.8 3.0 58.9% 64.4% 50.4% 47.3% 37.4% 58.7% 36.2%
22 1992 33/37 6.2 3.6 55.9% 70.4% 47.0% 62.4% 39.8% 60.1% 38.1% 1995 26/30 4.2 2.4 58.6% 71.7% 50.0% 51.9% 41.7% 62.6% 38.6%
23 1993 54/64 8.5 3.9 58.0% 73.3% 48.4% 60.4% 40.6% 62.8% 34.6% 1996 3/3 6.0 0.3 63.6% 68.9% 61.0% 76.2% 37.0% 66.1% 33.1%
24 1994 49/53 8.7 4.6 58.9% 73.2% 49.4% 57.8% 42.1% 63.4% 35.5% 1997 6/7 5.7 2.5 56.5% 74.3% 52.5% 67.4% 68.7% 64.8% 35.7%
25 1995 33/38 7.2 2.8 56.7% 72.8% 49.6% 60.0% 42.5% 62.9% 36.5% 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 65.5% 52.8% 47.4% 50.0% 50.0% 50.9% 25.0%
26 1996 34/39 7.7 3.0 59.8% 74.6% 48.7% 47.3% 42.4% 64.1% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 40/44 8.7 5.1 59.9% 75.9% 47.1% 58.1% 38.3% 64.5% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 50/57 11.1 3.6 59.7% 76.6% 49.0% 60.6% 41.3% 65.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 26/31 11.0 3.9 59.1% 72.8% 49.8% 61.0% 30.5% 63.2% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 34/38 9.8 3.4 59.6% 72.4% 50.7% 51.9% 49.1% 63.8% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 9/9 8.0 3.6 58.5% 69.4% 41.2% 45.9% 44.8% 57.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 2/2 4.0 6.0 60.9% 71.8% 34.2% 47.7% 22.5% 57.0% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 393/530 8.5 3.8 58.6% 73.4% 48.5% 57.4% 41.4% 63.1% 36.6% — 77/102 4.1 2.8 60.3% 69.3% 50.7% 55.1% 42.3% 61.8% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Fromberg Tommy Ho
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1493 111.5 — — — — +31 — — 16.7% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — -0.44
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1444 98.2 — — — — +20 — — 9.1% -2.27 0–1 — — +0.20
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1490 118.0 — — — — +32 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
18 1988 1551 111.4 — — — — +19 — — 46.4% -0.46 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.29 1991 1492 106.7 -0.42 -1.22 0.898 47.8% +20 — — 40.0% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
19 1989 1548 118.1 — — — — +34 — — 36.0% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.22 1992 1561 120.9 +0.64 +0.42 1.096 51.0% +23 — — 59.1% +0.41 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.42
20 1990 1663 138.3 — — — — -70 +70 -25 55.7% +0.45 11–12 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.40 1993 1553 117.7 -1.61 -2.42 0.843 46.9% +25 — — 40.7% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.53
21 1991 1643 133.9 +0.28 +1.30 1.064 51.0% +14 +47 — 48.4% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.91 1994 1484 112.9 -1.58 -0.49 0.877 47.5% +17 — — 25.0% -1.14 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.63
22 1992 1637 132.1 -0.58 -0.50 0.954 49.4% +19 +5 — 44.1% -0.28 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.04 1995 1562 130.5 +0.48 +1.09 1.031 50.3% +18 — +36 49.4% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.89
23 1993 1682 133.8 +1.16 -2.63 0.932 49.1% +27 -9 -121 50.3% +0.05 15–9 (63%) 21–19 (53%) — +0.53 1996 1557 112.9 -0.28 +0.97 0.978 49.8% +16 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
24 1994 1698 136.2 +1.93 -2.65 0.970 49.9% -30 +46 -86 47.6% -0.14 10–10 (50%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.37 1997 1561 115.7 +1.65 -1.05 1.015 50.2% +16 — — 47.4% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.34
25 1995 1672 142.3 +1.50 -1.49 0.983 49.6% -41 +85 — 49.4% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -0.88 1998 1546 96.1 -1.39 -2.17 0.509 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
26 1996 1633 136.1 +2.11 -0.57 1.060 50.8% +20 +51 — 47.4% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1997 1674 134.6 +2.54 -1.42 1.022 50.5% -72 +76 -91 44.2% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–17 (35%) — -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1998 1598 134.8 +3.39 -0.75 1.089 51.6% -4 +127 -33 47.4% +0.18 10–14 (42%) 8–24 (25%) — +1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 1667 126.4 +1.31 -2.30 0.922 49.0% -31 +33 -90 49.4% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 12–3 (80%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2000 1633 131.8 +1.64 -0.83 1.022 50.3% +93 -40 -74 49.1% +0.05 9–11 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 1502 115.9 -0.76 -1.82 0.772 45.4% +142 +20 — 18.2% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1486 104.4 +0.20 -1.39 0.783 45.5% — — — 28.6% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1823 139.4 +1.58 -1.32 0.994 50.0% +3 +49 -67 47.5% -0.08 92–106 (46%) 124–143 (46%) 97.7 -0.44 — 1622 127.2 -0.32 -0.37 0.946 48.8% +21 — +36 40.7% -0.54 9–23 (28%) 18–24 (43%) 91.9 +2.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.