H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Albert Montanes H2H: 5-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 5–1 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2013 Umag fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 26, 2013* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Montanes #49 6-4 6-4 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Gasquet #10 7-5 6-2 6-1 Albert Montanes #96 Match data
Aug 29, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Gasquet #14 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-3 Albert Montanes #111 Match data
May 10, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #16 6-2 6-3 Albert Montanes #38 Match data
Jul 31, 2010* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Richard Gasquet #47 7-6(5) 6-4 Albert Montanes #23 Match data
Jul 12, 2008* Stuttgart ATP 250 QF Clay Richard Gasquet #15 6-3 7-6(5) Albert Montanes #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —