H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-2

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2013 Madrid Masters third round 7-5 3-6 6-4.

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #52 7-5 3-6 6-4 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data
May 3, 2011* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 3-6 6-4 6-3 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data
Apr 13, 2010* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #75 6-2 4-6 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16