H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 3-3

Richard Gasquet and Dominic Thiem are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2024 Estoril fourth round 6-4 7-6(6).

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
AUT Age 32 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 5, 2024* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Richard Gasquet #122 6-4 7-6(6) Dominic Thiem #91 Match data
Apr 11, 2023* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Dominic Thiem #106 6-1 6-4 Richard Gasquet #43 Match data
Sep 22, 2022* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Dominic Thiem #182 6-3 7-6(3) Richard Gasquet #85 Match data
Oct 3, 2019* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Dominic Thiem #5 6-4 6-1 Richard Gasquet #42 Match data
Oct 27, 2017* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #32 4-6 7-5 6-1 Dominic Thiem #6 Match data
Oct 30, 2015* Basel ATP 500 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #11 7-6(1) 6-4 Dominic Thiem #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,241 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,848 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,889 0 3
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,015 0 7
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,064 0 11
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,145 0 16
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,200 1 17
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,627 1 17
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16