H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Gasquet vs Gilles Simon H2H: 9-1
Richard Gasquet holds a 9–1 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 6–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2020 Montpellier third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
9
–
1
10 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2020* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2018* | Metz | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Gilles Simon | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2018* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Richard Gasquet | 6-2 7-6(4) | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2017* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2012* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-2 6-1 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2011* | Dubai | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2009* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-0 6-2 6-3 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2006* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-1 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Gasquet | Gilles Simon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 |
| 35 | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 |
| 36 | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 |
| 37 | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |
| 38 | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |