H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 5-3

Richard Gasquet holds a 5–3 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jeremy Chardy leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2019 Hamburg fourth round 7-6(5) 7-5.

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 26, 2019* Hamburg ATP 500 R16 Clay Jeremy Chardy #77 7-6(5) 7-5 Richard Gasquet #65 Match data
May 14, 2019* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jeremy Chardy #42 6-1 4-6 6-3 Richard Gasquet #39 Match data
Jun 17, 2018* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 F Grass Richard Gasquet #30 6-3 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #72 Match data
Apr 17, 2018* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #34 6-4 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #84 Match data
Mar 24, 2018* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #90 7-5 6-1 Richard Gasquet #37 Match data
Oct 24, 2015* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Gasquet #12 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) Jeremy Chardy #29 Match data
Oct 7, 2014* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #22 7-6(7) 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #32 Match data
Jan 17, 2009* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Gasquet #25 6-2 7-6(4) Jeremy Chardy #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16