H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 5-3

Richard Gasquet holds a 5–3 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jeremy Chardy leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2019 Hamburg Open second round 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #77 7-6(5) 7-5 Richard Gasquet #65 Match data Jul 26, 2019* R16 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Jeremy Chardy #42 6-1 4-6 6-3 Richard Gasquet #39 Match data May 14, 2019* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Richard Gasquet #30 6-3 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #72 Match data Jun 17, 2018* F Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Richard Gasquet #34 6-4 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #84 Match data Apr 17, 2018* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Jeremy Chardy #90 7-5 6-1 Richard Gasquet #37 Match data Mar 24, 2018* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #12 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) Jeremy Chardy #29 Match data Oct 24, 2015* QF Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #22 7-6(7) 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #32 Match data Oct 7, 2014* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #25 6-2 7-6(4) Jeremy Chardy #73 Match data Jan 17, 2009* QF Sydney International ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.