H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 3-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–2 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 2–1 on clay, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2013 Halle fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 2013* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Richard Gasquet #9 6-3 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #36 Match data
May 15, 2012* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #22 6-1 7-6(6) Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data
Mar 15, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #21 6-1 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #10 Match data
May 17, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #35 6-3 6-4 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data
May 26, 2006* Poertschach ATP 250 R16 Clay Jurgen Melzer #75 6-0 1-1 (ret.) Richard Gasquet #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —