H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-3

Milos Raonic holds a 3–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2015 Queen's Club fourth round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 2015* Queen's Club ATP 500 R16 Grass Milos Raonic #8 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Richard Gasquet #19 Match data
Sep 28, 2013* Bangkok ATP 250 SF Hard Milos Raonic #11 3-6 7-5 6-4 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data
Sep 3, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #9 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(9) 7-5 Milos Raonic #11 Match data
Aug 14, 2012* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Milos Raonic #19 7-6(4) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16