H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-3

Milos Raonic holds a 3–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2015 Queen's Club Championships second round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Milos Raonic #8 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Richard Gasquet #19 Match data Jun 19, 2015* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP 500 Grass
Milos Raonic #11 3-6 7-5 6-4 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data Sep 28, 2013* SF Bangkok ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #9 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(9) 7-5 Milos Raonic #11 Match data Sep 3, 2013* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Milos Raonic #19 7-6(4) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data Aug 14, 2012* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,248 370 188 66.3% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,834 0 1
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2012 43–21 67.2% #13 1,980 0 3
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,036 0 5
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,088 0 6
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,048 0 7
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,162 0 8
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,078 0 8
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,975 0 8
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,934 0 8
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 2,016 0 8
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,978 0 8
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,918 0 8
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2024 6–6 50.0% #238 1,897 0 8
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Milos Raonic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2011 20 10 30 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 31 12 43 72.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 33 13 46 71.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 31 13 44 70.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 24 11 35 68.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2016 32 13 45 71.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — —
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 14 7 21 66.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 18 13 31 58.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2019 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2020 22 9 31 71.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2021 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2023 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2024 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 254 125 379 67.0% 62 36 98 63.3% 54 27 81 66.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 537/558 of Milos Raonic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Milos Raonic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% 2009 1/1 20.0 3.0 58.2% 85.9% 45.7% 85.7% 20.0% 69.1% 33.0%
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 2010 7/7 14.0 3.7 59.6% 79.1% 45.1% 63.7% 22.7% 65.7% 28.0%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2011 47/48 13.6 2.2 63.9% 78.9% 54.7% 66.3% 42.8% 70.1% 33.8%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2012 60/64 16.2 3.3 61.3% 82.6% 57.2% 70.4% 46.2% 73.2% 34.7%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2013 60/62 14.7 3.0 62.9% 82.8% 54.1% 66.2% 39.3% 72.2% 33.6%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2014 67/67 16.5 3.1 61.4% 82.6% 55.3% 66.1% 43.1% 72.0% 33.9%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2015 47/47 15.8 3.0 63.0% 81.5% 58.3% 75.5% 32.7% 73.0% 31.0%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2016 69/71 12.7 3.3 63.9% 80.9% 56.9% 69.0% 40.5% 72.2% 36.6%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2017 40/43 14.2 3.5 63.3% 80.4% 57.1% 65.3% 42.0% 71.8% 35.6%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2018 45/49 17.5 4.0 63.2% 83.4% 58.0% 57.4% 35.7% 74.2% 34.0%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2019 34/36 19.7 3.7 62.9% 84.7% 57.2% 63.3% 35.8% 74.5% 34.7%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2020 32/33 16.5 3.4 63.0% 84.0% 56.9% 78.8% 40.7% 74.0% 36.0%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2021 10/10 16.6 5.1 60.3% 80.5% 57.8% 64.1% 42.8% 71.4% 37.4%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2023 8/8 17.8 6.1 60.8% 82.6% 46.8% 70.2% 37.0% 68.5% 29.8%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2024 10/12 16.7 3.2 62.3% 83.2% 57.4% 52.9% 23.8% 73.2% 32.5%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 537/558 15.6 3.3 62.7% 82.0% 56.2% 67.4% 39.7% 72.4% 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Milos Raonic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 2008 1488 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35 2009 1535 118.1 +0.53 +4.04 1.069 51.1% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.13
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52 2010 1652 123.4 +0.54 -3.37 0.816 47.5% +23 — — 42.1% -0.74 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.22
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51 2011 1835 152.5 +5.93 -1.86 1.129 51.6% +62 -201 -204 61.2% +0.49 10–7 (59%) 22–12 (65%) 106.1 +0.34
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61 2012 1980 165.4 +9.03 -1.07 1.292 53.5% +43 -208 -253 65.4% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 27–22 (55%) 103.6 +1.28
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90 2013 2037 163.9 +7.91 -1.26 1.212 52.2% +56 -201 -372 62.5% +0.72 9–5 (64%) 19–17 (53%) 102.0 +1.75
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85 2014 2089 170.2 +7.97 -0.86 1.213 52.8% +12 -85 -241 66.9% +0.85 11–7 (61%) 38–13 (75%) 110.3 +3.89
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00 2015 2048 167.3 +7.76 -2.58 1.147 52.1% +48 -7 -157 62.1% +0.81 12–4 (75%) 22–19 (54%) 103.8 +1.09
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44 2016 2163 173.6 +8.50 +1.49 1.313 53.6% -7 -113 -8 69.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 27–14 (66%) 109.4 -1.03
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77 2017 2079 162.7 +6.78 +0.23 1.261 53.2% +49 -42 +25 66.7% +0.92 4–1 (80%) 16–11 (59%) 103.2 -0.68
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10 2018 1975 153.8 +8.35 -0.88 1.318 53.1% +7 +61 +177 64.0% +0.70 5–5 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 100.1 +1.79
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40 2019 1934 154.2 +7.20 -0.04 1.360 53.8% +1 — +195 67.8% +0.93 3–6 (33%) 19–9 (68%) 98.3 +1.72
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22 2020 2017 164.6 +7.82 +0.28 1.382 54.3% +17 — — 72.2% +1.32 2–5 (29%) 13–8 (62%) 96.3 +0.12
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59 2021 1979 139.0 +4.52 +0.69 1.309 53.5% +19 — — 62.1% +0.96 0–2 2–4 (33%) — +0.31
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58 2023 1919 127.9 +2.47 -1.58 0.944 49.3% +65 — +186 45.5% -0.23 1–0 3–4 (43%) — -0.07
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68 2024 1898 124.3 +5.72 -1.03 1.214 51.5% +70 — +199 61.9% +0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 -0.82
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 2248 169.1 +7.54 -0.67 1.241 52.8% +29 -114 -17 64.8% +0.80 81–60 (57%) 232–150 (61%) 107.6 +1.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.