H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 3-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–1 lead over Mischa Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2019 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mischa Zverev
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2019* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Richard Gasquet #39 6-3 6-4 6-3 Mischa Zverev #102 Match data
Apr 20, 2018* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Richard Gasquet #34 6-2 7-5 Mischa Zverev #55 Match data
Oct 1, 2016* Shenzhen ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Gasquet #18 7-6(4) 7-6(2) Mischa Zverev #120 Match data
Sep 25, 2010* Metz ATP 250 SF Hard Mischa Zverev #155 (w/o) Richard Gasquet #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Mischa Zverev #1,373 #25 1,664 2,007 134 199 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Mischa Zverev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #151 1,528 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2007 6–8 42.9% #88 1,606 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2008 18–23 43.9% #80 1,703 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2009 15–24 38.5% #78 1,630 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2010 14–18 43.8% #82 1,689 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2011 2–18 10.0% #211 1,498 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2012 0–3 0.0% #159 1,608 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2013 4–5 44.4% #176 1,639 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2015 7–8 46.7% #171 1,839 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2016 12–14 46.2% #51 1,917 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2017 30–31 49.2% #33 1,850 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2018 19–29 39.6% #69 1,686 0 1
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2019 3–12 20.0% #281 1,571 0 1
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2020 1–2 33.3% #264 1,568 0 1
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2021 0–1 0.0% #346 1,521 0 1
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —