H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Carlos Costa H2H: 2-1
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–1 lead over Carlos Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on clay, while Carlos Costa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1994 US Open second round 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 1-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Carlos Costa | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 1-6 7-6(4) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1994* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 7-6(6) 6-2 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 7-5 3-6 6-3 5-7 10-8 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 |