H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs David Engel H2H: 3-0
Richey Reneberg holds a 3–0 lead over David Engel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1993 Stockholm Masters second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1993* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Richey Reneberg | 6-2 6-4 | David Engel | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1990* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Richey Reneberg | 7-6 6-4 | David Engel | Match data |
| May 25, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Richey Reneberg | 6-4 6-2 4-6 6-3 | David Engel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Engel | #854 | #114 | 312 | 1,597 | 24 | 48 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | David Engel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #274 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #177 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #117 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #211 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |