H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Rik De Voest vs Julian Reister H2H: 0-1
Julian Reister holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julian Reister leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julian Reister won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-5 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2011 | Dubai | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Rik De Voest | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Julian Reister | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Julian Reister | 6-4 7-5 3-6 6-2 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julian Reister | #1,197 | #83 | 612 | 1,748 | 14 | 34 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Julian Reister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #231 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #184 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #563 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |