H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Rik De Voest vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 0-1
Somdev Devvarman holds a 1–0 lead over Rik De Voest in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Somdev Devvarman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Somdev Devvarman won the 2011 Johannesburg quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2011* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | Rik De Voest | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rik De Voest | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |