H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robby Ginepri vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-1
Robby Ginepri and Kevin Kim are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Kim won the 2006 Canada Masters second round 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2005* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-2 6-3 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robby Ginepri | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |