Robert Maud
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Laver | 1 | 8 | 9 | Mar 13, 1975 | H2H |
| Cliff Drysdale | 1 | 7 | 8 | Mar 24, 1973 | H2H |
| Roy Emerson | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 2, 1973 | H2H |
| Bob Lutz | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 14, 1973 | H2H |
| John Alexander | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 24, 1974 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Ismail El Shafei holds a 2–1 lead over Robert Maud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Ismail El Shafei leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ismail El Shafei won the 1975 St. Petersburg Wct round of 32 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ismail El Shafei | 6-3 6-3 | Robert Maud | Match data | Feb 6, 1975* | R32 | St. Petersburg Wct | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Ismail El Shafei | 6-4 6-3 | Robert Maud | Match data | Feb 1, 1974* | R32 | Richmond-Wct | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Robert Maud | 6-3 6-4 | Ismail El Shafei | Match data | May 4, 1971* | R32 | Dallas Wct | ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,765 | 123 | 130 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ismail El Shafei | — | — | — | 1,907 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robert Maud | Ismail El Shafei | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #178 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Robert Maud | Ismail El Shafei | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| 21 | 1968 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1969 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1970 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% |
| 24 | 1971 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1972 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% |
| 25 | 1972 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 13 | 15 | 13.3% | 1973 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 11 | 13 | 15.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
| 26 | 1973 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1974 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 27 | 1974 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1975 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 28 | 1975 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1976 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 38 | 39 | 77 | 49.4% | 40 | 34 | 74 | 54.1% | 27 | 20 | 47 | 57.4% | 18 | 37 | 55 | 32.7% | — | 51 | 55 | 106 | 48.1% | 78 | 102 | 180 | 43.3% | 29 | 40 | 69 | 42.0% | 32 | 53 | 85 | 37.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Robert Maud | Ismail El Shafei | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1540 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 58.8% | +0.29 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.37 |
| 21 | 1968 | 1700 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +163 | +11 | -204 | 65.8% | +0.93 | 6–4 (60%) | — | — | +0.89 | 1969 | 1656 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | -8 | +11 | -112 | 52.0% | +0.11 | 5–7 (42%) | — | — | -0.82 |
| 22 | 1969 | 1703 | 122.5 | — | — | — | — | +258 | +33 | -167 | 66.3% | +1.14 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–0 | — | +2.57 | 1970 | 1611 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | +51 | 0 | -116 | 36.6% | -0.96 | 2–10 (17%) | 1–3 (25%) | 91.9 | -3.33 |
| 23 | 1970 | 1696 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +234 | -52 | -5 | 60.2% | +0.90 | 5–4 (56%) | — | — | +2.00 | 1971 | 1712 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +32 | -221 | 43.5% | -0.64 | 5–12 (29%) | 5–4 (56%) | 96.3 | -3.44 |
| 24 | 1971 | 1670 | 137.5 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +7 | +12 | 42.4% | -0.42 | 5–11 (31%) | 8–7 (53%) | 95.5 | -4.04 | 1972 | 1852 | 151.6 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -77 | — | 44.6% | -0.18 | 9–5 (64%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | -6.93 |
| 25 | 1972 | 1588 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +83 | — | 23.6% | -1.46 | 1–6 (14%) | 0–9 (0%) | 91.4 | -3.96 | 1973 | 1728 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -100 | -128 | 38.7% | -0.99 | 3–7 (30%) | 7–4 (64%) | 101.9 | -6.77 |
| 26 | 1973 | 1587 | 131.8 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +51 | — | 40.0% | -0.72 | 4–7 (36%) | 7–3 (70%) | 103.5 | -0.85 | 1974 | 1874 | 144.5 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -120 | -72 | 58.6% | +0.70 | 9–5 (64%) | 11–8 (58%) | 110.9 | -2.55 |
| 27 | 1974 | 1641 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +18 | +50 | 41.9% | -0.73 | 8–3 (73%) | 7–1 (88%) | 113.1 | +0.16 | 1975 | 1739 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | +70 | -77 | +57 | 42.4% | -0.34 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–11 (21%) | 94.0 | -2.24 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1604 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | -74 | +56 | — | 27.6% | -1.69 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–0 | — | -1.13 | 1976 | 1640 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | +75 | -11 | +177 | 42.7% | -0.49 | 2–9 (18%) | 4–8 (33%) | 91.7 | -1.80 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1669 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -76 | +111 | 49.4% | -0.08 | 5–4 (56%) | 9–7 (56%) | 101.7 | +1.94 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1575 | 137.1 | — | — | — | — | +69 | +26 | +160 | 42.3% | -0.28 | 2–9 (18%) | 7–5 (58%) | 95.2 | -0.37 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1559 | 115.8 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +25 | — | 41.9% | -0.44 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–6 (25%) | 95.5 | +1.44 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1522 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | 38.1% | -0.52 | 0–2 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +1.52 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1549 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.4 | +0.91 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1543 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.5% | -1.13 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.17 |
| Career | — | 1766 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +23 | -46 | 49.5% | 0.00 | 32–44 (42%) | 25–20 (56%) | 102.5 | -1.79 | — | 1908 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -35 | -26 | 45.5% | -0.28 | 55–84 (40%) | 59–71 (45%) | 94.3 | -5.20 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Laver | 1 | 8 | 9 | Mar 13, 1975 | H2H |
| Cliff Drysdale | 1 | 7 | 8 | Mar 24, 1973 | H2H |
| Roy Emerson | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 2, 1973 | H2H |
| Bob Lutz | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 14, 1973 | H2H |
| John Alexander | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 24, 1974 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Ashe | 7 | 8 | 15 | Nov 8, 1975 | — |
| Marty Riessen | 4 | 10 | 14 | Jul 19, 1973 | — |
| Tom Okker | 4 | 7 | 11 | Nov 8, 1978 | — |
| Rod Laver | 4 | 6 | 10 | Apr 18, 1975 | — |
| John Newcombe | 3 | 7 | 10 | Nov 21, 1974 | — |