H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 4-2

Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 4–2 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2022 Swedish Open second round 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberto Bautista Agut #93 6-1 6-2 Dominic Thiem #91 Match data Apr 7, 2024* Q1 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Dominic Thiem #339 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #20 Match data Jul 15, 2022* R16 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Roberto Bautista Agut #13 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 Dominic Thiem #4 Match data Mar 12, 2021* QF Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Dominic Thiem #8 6-4 6-3 Roberto Bautista Agut #26 Match data Sep 22, 2018* SF St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Roberto Bautista Agut #17 6-3 6-2 Dominic Thiem #47 Match data Feb 25, 2015* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Roberto Bautista Agut #16 7-6(7) 6-3 Dominic Thiem #48 Match data Feb 21, 2015* QF Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Roberto Bautista Agut #16 4-6 6-2 6-3 7-6(5) Dominic Thiem #40 Match data Jan 21, 2015* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #232 #9 3,215 2,104 415 296 58.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,552 0 0 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 — — — — — — — 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,658 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2013 26–22 54.2% #58 1,801 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,029 0 2 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2016 49–23 68.1% #14 1,992 0 4 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 2,003 0 6 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,934 0 8 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,945 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,962 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,845 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,878 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,747 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,813 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #232 1,631 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 1 8 87.5% 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2015 25 17 42 59.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2016 37 16 53 69.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 2017 30 13 43 69.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2018 19 11 30 63.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2019 25 13 38 65.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 19 13 32 59.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 10 12 22 45.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12 13 25 48.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 4 10 14 28.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 255 181 436 58.5% 103 85 188 54.8% 57 30 87 65.5% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 698/711 of Roberto Bautista Agut's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 2009 1/1 0.0 1.0 58.3% 65.3% 45.7% 44.4% 50.0% 57.1% 37.5% 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.5% 57.1% 55.6% 62.5% 0.0% 56.6% 34.7% 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2012 13/13 2.5 2.8 60.9% 65.2% 44.8% 55.4% 37.6% 57.1% 38.8% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2013 48/48 2.2 1.7 70.5% 65.0% 53.7% 58.9% 47.9% 61.7% 40.2% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2014 64/65 2.7 2.0 69.2% 70.0% 53.4% 63.0% 46.8% 64.8% 39.9% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2015 70/70 3.7 1.9 64.3% 72.5% 56.4% 65.4% 44.7% 66.7% 37.8% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2016 65/72 3.5 2.2 65.4% 69.7% 53.2% 58.5% 42.5% 64.1% 40.0% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2017 67/68 2.9 2.2 63.1% 71.4% 55.6% 57.2% 45.1% 65.5% 42.0% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2018 51/51 3.2 2.0 63.6% 71.6% 54.1% 64.0% 46.4% 65.4% 39.4% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2019 61/62 3.9 1.7 65.7% 73.0% 56.5% 61.9% 43.0% 67.4% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 22/22 3.6 2.3 66.8% 67.1% 55.5% 59.9% 43.5% 63.2% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 51/52 3.3 1.7 65.3% 70.8% 55.0% 58.0% 47.3% 65.1% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 48/50 2.9 1.7 66.1% 71.2% 54.3% 60.5% 42.5% 65.4% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 38/38 3.9 1.8 65.7% 70.2% 56.1% 48.4% 39.3% 65.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 44/44 2.7 2.0 68.2% 68.5% 53.6% 61.0% 46.3% 63.7% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 37/37 2.7 2.1 66.2% 67.9% 49.2% 54.3% 41.2% 61.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 17/17 3.2 1.5 67.6% 63.6% 48.9% 58.0% 20.5% 58.9% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 698/711 3.2 2.0 66.0% 70.0% 54.1% 59.6% 43.7% 64.5% 39.1% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 2007 1516 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2008 1520 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2009 1552 103.5 +1.07 -0.83 0.875 47.6% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — 0.00 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2010 1512 104.6 +2.71 -1.02 0.798 45.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — 0.00 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2011 1527 111.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2012 1658 125.8 -3.50 +0.03 0.904 47.8% +40 — — 24.1% -1.07 1–1 0–2 — +0.77 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2013 1801 149.4 -1.14 +2.56 1.049 50.8% -5 -134 -122 55.2% +0.16 9–7 (56%) 16–4 (80%) 112.8 +0.31 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2014 2030 165.9 +1.17 +3.88 1.135 52.4% -48 -120 -136 63.1% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–7 (63%) 111.4 +0.17 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2015 1997 164.8 +2.59 +2.45 1.136 52.3% +5 -85 -72 58.5% +0.74 8–11 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 95.5 -0.10 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2016 1993 166.6 +0.70 +3.83 1.115 52.0% +18 -28 -84 60.2% +0.64 16–10 (62%) 18–13 (58%) 101.1 +1.33 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2017 2004 165.0 +2.13 +5.30 1.216 53.4% +17 -43 -69 64.5% +0.96 9–9 (50%) 18–15 (55%) 98.3 +1.62 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2018 1934 153.9 +1.51 +3.16 1.139 52.4% +2 +33 +16 58.9% +0.65 13–4 (76%) 10–15 (40%) 100.4 +1.35 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2019 1945 168.2 +2.85 +3.28 1.198 52.6% +17 -23 +127 62.6% +0.84 13–10 (57%) 8–14 (36%) 96.4 -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1963 158.1 +0.25 +4.32 1.148 52.4% +5 -47 — 61.8% +0.84 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1845 157.0 +1.63 +3.89 1.161 52.3% +59 +10 +180 55.6% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 90.9 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1879 155.5 +1.66 +3.64 1.172 52.8% +3 -22 +178 60.7% +0.92 5–8 (38%) 10–11 (48%) 94.4 +1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1747 145.2 +1.16 +0.69 1.049 50.3% +31 +36 +265 47.1% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 12–12 (50%) 98.4 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1814 141.9 -0.50 +1.21 1.022 50.6% -33 -28 +201 51.8% +0.04 6–7 (46%) 11–5 (69%) 102.5 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1771 133.9 -1.44 +0.34 0.951 49.2% -82 -25 +183 39.6% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 6–11 (35%) 97.4 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1632 116.3 -4.33 -4.02 0.670 44.6% +43 +10 — 27.5% -1.57 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2104 160.3 +0.95 +2.86 1.103 51.7% +5 -39 +70 56.5% +0.48 125–104 (55%) 151–142 (52%) 99.9 +0.42 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.