H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 3-0
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 3–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2018 Basel fourth round 6-7(6) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2018* | Basel | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2017* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-4 6-3 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 4-6 6-2 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |