H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Jack Sock H2H: 2-2

Roberto Bautista Agut and Jack Sock are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jack Sock leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2016 Auckland final 6-1 1-0 RET.

Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 2016* Auckland ATP 250 F Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #25 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Jack Sock #26 Match data
Apr 10, 2015* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Jack Sock #46 6-4 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #15 Match data
Mar 17, 2015* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jack Sock #58 3-6 6-3 6-2 Roberto Bautista Agut #16 Match data
Jan 10, 2014* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #73 6-1 6-3 Jack Sock #100 Match data
Sep 30, 2013 Beijing ATP 500 Q2 Q Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #64 4-6 6-2 6-1 Jack Sock #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,127 177 147 54.6% 0 1 0 0 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Jack Sock
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #878 1,458 0 0
18 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,490 0 0
19 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0
20 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,697 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1
23 2016 36–18 66.7% #23 2,034 0 1
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,992 0 4
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,716 0 4
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4
28 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,746 0 4
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12