H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-2

Roberto Bautista Agut and Jeremy Chardy are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 2–1 on clay, while Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2017 Paris Masters third round 6-4 6-1.

Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 2017* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Roberto Bautista Agut #23 6-4 6-1 Jeremy Chardy #88 Match data
May 11, 2016* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jeremy Chardy #32 7-6(6) 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #17 Match data
Apr 13, 2016* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Roberto Bautista Agut #17 6-3 5-7 7-5 Jeremy Chardy #33 Match data
May 30, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jeremy Chardy #27 6-1 7-5 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #180 #9 3,215 2,106 411 294 58.3% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,553 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,661 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #58 1,800 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,005 0 2 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2016 46–22 67.6% #14 1,991 0 4 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 1,999 0 6 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,932 0 8 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,940 0 9 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,960 0 9 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,849 0 9 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,870 0 11 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,745 0 11
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,812 0 12 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #180 1,631 0 12