H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-2

Roberto Bautista Agut and Jeremy Chardy are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 2–1 on clay, while Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2017 Paris Masters second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberto Bautista Agut #23 6-4 6-1 Jeremy Chardy #88 Match data Nov 2, 2017* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #32 7-6(6) 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #17 Match data May 11, 2016* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Roberto Bautista Agut #17 6-3 5-7 7-5 Jeremy Chardy #33 Match data Apr 13, 2016* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Jeremy Chardy #27 6-1 7-5 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #68 Match data May 30, 2013* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #232 #9 3,215 2,104 415 296 58.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,552 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,658 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2013 26–22 54.2% #58 1,801 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,029 0 2 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2016 49–23 68.1% #14 1,992 0 4 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 2,003 0 6 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,934 0 8 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,945 0 9 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,962 0 9 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,845 0 9 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,878 0 11 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,747 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,813 0 12 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #232 1,631 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2014 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 1 8 87.5% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2015 25 17 42 59.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2016 37 16 53 69.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2017 30 13 43 69.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2018 19 11 30 63.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2019 25 13 38 65.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 2020 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2022 19 13 32 59.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 2023 10 12 22 45.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12 13 25 48.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2025 4 10 14 28.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 255 181 436 58.5% 103 85 188 54.8% 57 30 87 65.5% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 698/711 of Roberto Bautista Agut's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2009 1/1 0.0 1.0 58.3% 65.3% 45.7% 44.4% 50.0% 57.1% 37.5% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.5% 57.1% 55.6% 62.5% 0.0% 56.6% 34.7% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2012 13/13 2.5 2.8 60.9% 65.2% 44.8% 55.4% 37.6% 57.1% 38.8% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2013 48/48 2.2 1.7 70.5% 65.0% 53.7% 58.9% 47.9% 61.7% 40.2% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2014 64/65 2.7 2.0 69.2% 70.0% 53.4% 63.0% 46.8% 64.8% 39.9% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2015 70/70 3.7 1.9 64.3% 72.5% 56.4% 65.4% 44.7% 66.7% 37.8% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2016 65/72 3.5 2.2 65.4% 69.7% 53.2% 58.5% 42.5% 64.1% 40.0% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2017 67/68 2.9 2.2 63.1% 71.4% 55.6% 57.2% 45.1% 65.5% 42.0% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2018 51/51 3.2 2.0 63.6% 71.6% 54.1% 64.0% 46.4% 65.4% 39.4% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 2019 61/62 3.9 1.7 65.7% 73.0% 56.5% 61.9% 43.0% 67.4% 39.0% 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 2020 22/22 3.6 2.3 66.8% 67.1% 55.5% 59.9% 43.5% 63.2% 42.3% 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2021 51/52 3.3 1.7 65.3% 70.8% 55.0% 58.0% 47.3% 65.1% 40.5% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 2022 48/50 2.9 1.7 66.1% 71.2% 54.3% 60.5% 42.5% 65.4% 40.5% 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
35 2023 38/38 3.9 1.8 65.7% 70.2% 56.1% 48.4% 39.3% 65.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 44/44 2.7 2.0 68.2% 68.5% 53.6% 61.0% 46.3% 63.7% 37.1% 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
37 2025 37/37 2.7 2.1 66.2% 67.9% 49.2% 54.3% 41.2% 61.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 17/17 3.2 1.5 67.6% 63.6% 48.9% 58.0% 20.5% 58.9% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 698/711 3.2 2.0 66.0% 70.0% 54.1% 59.6% 43.7% 64.5% 39.1% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1516 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2008 1520 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2009 1552 103.5 +1.07 -0.83 0.875 47.6% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — 0.00 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2010 1512 104.6 +2.71 -1.02 0.798 45.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — 0.00 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2011 1527 111.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2012 1658 125.8 -3.50 +0.03 0.904 47.8% +40 — — 24.1% -1.07 1–1 0–2 — +0.77 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2013 1801 149.4 -1.14 +2.56 1.049 50.8% -5 -134 -122 55.2% +0.16 9–7 (56%) 16–4 (80%) 112.8 +0.31 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2014 2030 165.9 +1.17 +3.88 1.135 52.4% -48 -120 -136 63.1% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–7 (63%) 111.4 +0.17 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2015 1997 164.8 +2.59 +2.45 1.136 52.3% +5 -85 -72 58.5% +0.74 8–11 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 95.5 -0.10 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2016 1993 166.6 +0.70 +3.83 1.115 52.0% +18 -28 -84 60.2% +0.64 16–10 (62%) 18–13 (58%) 101.1 +1.33 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2017 2004 165.0 +2.13 +5.30 1.216 53.4% +17 -43 -69 64.5% +0.96 9–9 (50%) 18–15 (55%) 98.3 +1.62 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2018 1934 153.9 +1.51 +3.16 1.139 52.4% +2 +33 +16 58.9% +0.65 13–4 (76%) 10–15 (40%) 100.4 +1.35 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 2019 1945 168.2 +2.85 +3.28 1.198 52.6% +17 -23 +127 62.6% +0.84 13–10 (57%) 8–14 (36%) 96.4 -1.44 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 2020 1963 158.1 +0.25 +4.32 1.148 52.4% +5 -47 — 61.8% +0.84 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 -0.99 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 2021 1845 157.0 +1.63 +3.89 1.161 52.3% +59 +10 +180 55.6% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 90.9 +0.34 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 2022 1879 155.5 +1.66 +3.64 1.172 52.8% +3 -22 +178 60.7% +0.92 5–8 (38%) 10–11 (48%) 94.4 +1.54 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
35 2023 1747 145.2 +1.16 +0.69 1.049 50.3% +31 +36 +265 47.1% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 12–12 (50%) 98.4 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1814 141.9 -0.50 +1.21 1.022 50.6% -33 -28 +201 51.8% +0.04 6–7 (46%) 11–5 (69%) 102.5 -0.45 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
37 2025 1771 133.9 -1.44 +0.34 0.951 49.2% -82 -25 +183 39.6% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 6–11 (35%) 97.4 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1632 116.3 -4.33 -4.03 0.670 44.6% +43 +10 — 27.5% -1.57 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2104 160.3 +0.95 +2.86 1.103 51.7% +5 -39 +70 56.5% +0.48 125–104 (55%) 151–142 (52%) 99.9 +0.42 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.