H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 2-0
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 2–0 lead over Rogerio Dutra Silva in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2017 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-4 4-6 6-0 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2017* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 6-2 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,745 | 23 | 59 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |