H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Tim Smyczek H2H: 3-0
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 3–0 lead over Tim Smyczek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2017 Canada Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2017* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Tim Smyczek | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 6-2 6-1 | Tim Smyczek | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-2 6-1 6-1 | Tim Smyczek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Tim Smyczek | #862 | #68 | 688 | 1,768 | 43 | 85 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Tim Smyczek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #89 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #140 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #355 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |