H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roberto Carballes Baena vs Joao Sousa H2H: 4-0
Roberto Carballes Baena holds a 4–0 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberto Carballes Baena leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Carballes Baena won the 2022 Marrakech fourth round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 6-2 7-6(4) | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2021* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 6-3 6-1 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2017* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 6-3 6-1 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2014* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-2 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Carballes Baena | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |