H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Robin Haase vs Antonio Veic H2H: 1-0

Robin Haase holds a 1–0 lead over Antonio Veic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2013 Zagreb round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Antonio Veic
CRO Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robin Haase #58 2-6 6-3 6-3 Antonio Veic #126 Match data Feb 7, 2013* R32 Zagreb ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 258 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Antonio Veic #888 #119 468 1,718 10 22 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Haase Antonio Veic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #271 1,444 0 0
21 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0 2009 2–1 66.7% #220 1,469 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #191 1,532 0 0
23 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0 2011 4–6 40.0% #159 1,670 0 0
24 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,779 0 1 2012 3–5 37.5% #131 1,641 0 0
25 2012 16–26 38.1% #56 1,696 0 2 2013 0–5 0.0% #217 1,582 0 0
26 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #473 1,549 0 0
28 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,766 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2016 14–20 41.2% #59 1,747 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,810 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,686 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,662 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,532 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #1202 1,522 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin Haase Antonio Veic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 5 8 13 38.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
24 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2012 4 13 17 23.5% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 15 17 32 46.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 142 242 41.3% 80 82 162 49.4% 22 34 56 39.3% — 5 9 14 35.7% 5 13 18 27.8% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 457/459 of Robin Haase's and 32/32 of Antonio Veic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Robin Haase Antonio Veic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 2/2 4.5 3.5 53.2% 65.4% 47.5% 61.3% 35.1% 57.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 21/21 6.0 2.6 58.8% 72.4% 49.9% 65.1% 35.8% 63.2% 32.7% 2008 1/1 0.0 5.0 52.2% 62.9% 34.4% 64.3% 66.7% 49.3% 38.5%
21 2008 25/25 6.2 2.8 60.6% 71.7% 52.6% 62.0% 44.7% 64.0% 36.9% 2009 3/3 6.3 3.7 56.6% 69.5% 52.4% 71.5% 56.7% 62.0% 35.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 4/4 2.3 1.0 66.2% 63.9% 57.3% 55.4% 62.6% 61.4% 36.5%
23 2010 17/17 7.0 3.2 59.3% 74.1% 50.5% 62.0% 40.6% 64.4% 34.2% 2011 10/10 4.5 3.1 58.5% 63.2% 42.4% 48.2% 54.4% 54.3% 39.1%
24 2011 49/49 7.4 2.7 59.2% 70.7% 50.2% 54.4% 44.3% 62.4% 38.8% 2012 8/8 1.4 2.8 64.3% 68.9% 47.9% 50.4% 47.1% 61.5% 40.2%
25 2012 41/42 5.5 2.4 58.5% 72.6% 46.9% 47.4% 37.9% 61.7% 37.1% 2013 5/5 0.8 3.0 66.3% 56.3% 43.2% 30.8% 39.3% 51.0% 31.6%
26 2013 54/54 6.0 2.8 61.7% 71.8% 48.2% 61.4% 47.5% 62.7% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 38/38 5.3 2.4 60.9% 69.7% 48.8% 55.8% 38.6% 61.5% 33.7% 2015 1/1 2.0 4.0 65.6% 62.5% 28.6% 55.6% 25.0% 50.8% 33.3%
28 2015 34/34 5.1 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 50.4% 56.7% 44.6% 61.3% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 33/34 6.6 2.4 59.0% 73.3% 49.0% 58.2% 47.0% 63.4% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 54/54 7.3 3.0 59.3% 73.4% 51.1% 58.4% 40.5% 64.4% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 52/52 7.5 3.0 57.4% 72.4% 49.4% 53.7% 46.8% 62.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 29/29 6.8 3.8 56.1% 73.7% 48.7% 63.8% 38.8% 62.6% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1/1 12.0 4.0 56.3% 76.2% 51.0% 80.0% 28.6% 65.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 4/4 9.0 2.3 60.3% 73.8% 53.9% 65.6% 55.2% 65.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 58.8% 75.0% 25.0% 78.6% — 54.4% 18.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2/2 9.5 1.5 54.5% 71.2% 52.3% 48.5% 45.0% 62.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 457/460 6.5 2.8 59.3% 72.0% 49.5% 57.5% 42.7% 62.8% 35.7% — 32/32 2.8 2.9 62.0% 64.2% 46.0% 49.8% 50.9% 56.9% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin Haase Antonio Veic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2006 1489 110.0 +2.06 -3.84 0.869 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 — — -0.29 2007 1453 90.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1619 121.1 0.00 -2.69 0.888 48.7% -29 -30 — 43.1% -0.45 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.09 2008 1445 99.2 -0.85 -5.19 0.758 44.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
21 2008 1673 135.7 +0.43 +0.59 1.024 50.3% +64 -65 -158 48.4% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.68 2009 1469 110.3 +0.50 +0.45 0.943 49.3% +81 — — 50.0% -0.13 2–0 1–1 — -0.06
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1532 107.8 -2.29 -0.16 0.946 48.7% +46 — — 30.0% -0.50 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
23 2010 1692 132.9 +0.65 -0.48 0.961 49.0% +64 — -133 40.0% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.36 2011 1671 121.9 -3.75 +0.44 0.855 46.8% -50 +63 — 34.6% -0.81 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.16
24 2011 1779 144.3 -0.26 +1.34 1.032 50.6% -48 -6 -138 54.4% +0.30 8–12 (40%) 8–16 (33%) — +0.39 2012 1642 118.3 -1.65 -0.78 1.045 50.7% -22 +89 — 42.1% +0.11 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.12
25 2012 1697 141.9 -0.74 -0.01 0.971 49.2% -73 +151 -117 38.8% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 1–9 (10%) — -0.26 2013 1583 108.5 -3.24 -2.73 0.645 41.5% — +148 — 16.7% -2.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.12
26 2013 1852 144.6 -0.82 -0.70 0.956 49.6% -121 +73 -285 47.5% +0.05 17–8 (68%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.40 2014 1599 115.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1716 132.5 -1.56 -2.99 0.876 48.1% -36 +47 -94 42.6% -0.32 8–6 (57%) 1–11 (8%) — +0.05 2015 1549 102.7 -1.93 -0.71 0.678 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11
28 2015 1767 135.3 -1.96 -1.52 0.880 47.9% -87 -38 -12 41.8% -0.60 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1748 137.6 -0.31 -0.60 0.974 49.3% -40 -10 -34 43.5% -0.38 5–5 (50%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1810 158.9 +1.47 +0.65 1.034 50.5% -8 -56 -118 49.3% +0.01 7–14 (33%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1780 146.8 -0.97 +0.09 0.953 49.4% +10 -86 -41 47.2% -0.18 13–14 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1686 131.3 -1.19 -1.16 0.924 48.7% +34 -63 +43 40.5% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1662 110.2 +0.76 -2.31 0.931 49.1% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1616 115.8 +0.38 -0.57 0.999 49.2% +49 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1569 100.6 -4.87 -1.01 0.399 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1533 107.7 -0.45 +0.21 0.935 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 2–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1522 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1861 145.6 -0.45 -0.47 0.959 49.4% -26 +15 -87 45.3% -0.23 85–97 (47%) 81–123 (40%) 95.3 -0.03 — 1718 116.9 -2.42 -0.65 0.868 47.2% +14 +92 — 32.9% -0.89 7–6 (54%) 1–9 (10%) 97.1 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.