H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Robin Haase vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 2-0

Robin Haase holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2013 Bangkok round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robin Haase #60 6-2 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #65 Match data Sep 26, 2013* R32 Bangkok ATP 250 Hard
Robin Haase #54 6-2 7-6(3) 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #55 Match data May 24, 2011* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 258 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Haase Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,779 0 1 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2012 16–26 38.1% #56 1,696 0 2 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,766 0 2 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2016 14–20 41.2% #59 1,747 0 2 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,810 0 2 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,686 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,662 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,532 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #1202 1,522 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin Haase Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2007 5 8 13 38.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2010 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2012 4 13 17 23.5% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2016 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2017 15 17 32 46.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 142 242 41.3% 80 82 162 49.4% 22 34 56 39.3% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 457/459 of Robin Haase's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Robin Haase Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2006 2/2 4.5 3.5 53.2% 65.4% 47.5% 61.3% 35.1% 57.3% 37.1% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2007 21/21 6.0 2.6 58.8% 72.4% 49.9% 65.1% 35.8% 63.2% 32.7% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2008 25/25 6.2 2.8 60.6% 71.7% 52.6% 62.0% 44.7% 64.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2010 17/17 7.0 3.2 59.3% 74.1% 50.5% 62.0% 40.6% 64.4% 34.2% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2011 49/49 7.4 2.7 59.2% 70.7% 50.2% 54.4% 44.3% 62.4% 38.8% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2012 41/42 5.5 2.4 58.5% 72.6% 46.9% 47.4% 37.9% 61.7% 37.1% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2013 54/54 6.0 2.8 61.7% 71.8% 48.2% 61.4% 47.5% 62.7% 35.6% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2014 38/38 5.3 2.4 60.9% 69.7% 48.8% 55.8% 38.6% 61.5% 33.7% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2015 34/34 5.1 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 50.4% 56.7% 44.6% 61.3% 34.0% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2016 33/34 6.6 2.4 59.0% 73.3% 49.0% 58.2% 47.0% 63.4% 35.7% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2017 54/54 7.3 3.0 59.3% 73.4% 51.1% 58.4% 40.5% 64.4% 36.8% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2018 52/52 7.5 3.0 57.4% 72.4% 49.4% 53.7% 46.8% 62.5% 35.7% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2019 29/29 6.8 3.8 56.1% 73.7% 48.7% 63.8% 38.8% 62.6% 34.6% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2020 1/1 12.0 4.0 56.3% 76.2% 51.0% 80.0% 28.6% 65.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 4/4 9.0 2.3 60.3% 73.8% 53.9% 65.6% 55.2% 65.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 58.8% 75.0% 25.0% 78.6% — 54.4% 18.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2/2 9.5 1.5 54.5% 71.2% 52.3% 48.5% 45.0% 62.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 457/460 6.5 2.8 59.3% 72.0% 49.5% 57.5% 42.7% 62.8% 35.7% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin Haase Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2006 1489 110.0 +2.06 -3.84 0.869 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 — — -0.29 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2007 1619 121.1 0.00 -2.69 0.888 48.7% -29 -30 — 43.1% -0.45 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 105.3 +0.09 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2008 1673 135.7 +0.43 +0.59 1.024 50.3% +64 -65 -158 48.4% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 98.6 -0.68 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2010 1692 132.9 +0.65 -0.48 0.961 49.0% +64 — -133 40.0% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 98.1 -0.36 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2011 1779 144.3 -0.26 +1.34 1.032 50.6% -48 -6 -138 54.4% +0.30 8–12 (40%) 8–16 (33%) 95.0 +0.39 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2012 1697 141.9 -0.74 -0.01 0.971 49.2% -73 +151 -117 38.8% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 1–9 (10%) 90.6 -0.26 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2013 1852 144.6 -0.82 -0.70 0.956 49.6% -121 +73 -285 47.5% +0.05 17–8 (68%) 10–14 (42%) 107.5 +0.40 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2014 1716 132.5 -1.56 -2.99 0.876 48.1% -36 +47 -94 42.6% -0.32 8–6 (57%) 1–11 (8%) 94.5 +0.05 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2015 1767 135.3 -1.96 -1.52 0.880 47.9% -87 -38 -12 41.8% -0.60 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.06 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2016 1748 137.6 -0.31 -0.60 0.974 49.3% -40 -10 -34 43.5% -0.38 5–5 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.19 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2017 1810 158.9 +1.47 +0.65 1.034 50.5% -8 -56 -118 49.3% +0.01 7–14 (33%) 9–13 (41%) 95.5 -0.52 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2018 1780 146.8 -0.97 +0.09 0.953 49.4% +10 -86 -41 47.2% -0.18 13–14 (48%) 16–14 (53%) 101.6 +1.30 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2019 1686 131.3 -1.19 -1.16 0.924 48.7% +34 -63 +43 40.5% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) 96.4 +0.27 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2020 1662 110.2 +0.76 -2.31 0.931 49.1% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1616 115.8 +0.38 -0.57 0.999 49.2% +49 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1569 100.6 -4.87 -1.01 0.399 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1533 107.7 -0.45 +0.21 0.935 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 2–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1522 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1861 145.6 -0.45 -0.47 0.959 49.4% -26 +15 -87 45.3% -0.23 85–97 (47%) 81–123 (40%) 95.3 -0.03 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.