H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Robin Haase vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 0-4
Jurgen Melzer holds a 4–0 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2013 Zagreb semifinal 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 45
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2013* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jurgen Melzer | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jurgen Melzer | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jurgen Melzer | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| May 22, 2008* | Poertschach | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jurgen Melzer | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Robin Haase | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jurgen Melzer | #1,552 | #8 | 3,055 | 2,024 | 326 | 303 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Jurgen Melzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #491 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #52 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #41 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #28 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,998 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #27 | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #113 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #155 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |