H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Robin Haase vs Matthias Bachinger H2H: 2-0
Robin Haase holds a 2–0 lead over Matthias Bachinger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2012 Hamburg third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2012* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Robin Haase | 6-4 6-2 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2012* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robin Haase | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | Matthias Bachinger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Matthias Bachinger | #1,763 | #85 | 625 | 1,770 | 31 | 55 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Matthias Bachinger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #123 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #141 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #130 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #223 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |