H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Robin Haase vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 2-1

Robin Haase holds a 2–1 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Robin Haase leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2018 ABN AMRO Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robin Haase #42 6-2 6-2 Thiemo de Bakker #352 Match data Feb 15, 2018* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Robin Haase #95 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 Thiemo de Bakker #136 Match data Jul 21, 2016* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Thiemo de Bakker #96 6-3 6-4 Robin Haase #447 Match data Jan 8, 2010* R16 Chennai ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 258 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Haase Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,779 0 1 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2012 16–26 38.1% #56 1,696 0 2 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,766 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2016 14–20 41.2% #59 1,747 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,810 0 2 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,686 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,662 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,616 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,532 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #1202 1,522 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin Haase Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2007 5 8 13 38.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
23 2010 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 11 14 25 44.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2012 4 13 17 23.5% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2017 15 17 32 46.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 7 10 17 41.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 142 242 41.3% 80 82 162 49.4% 22 34 56 39.3% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 457/459 of Robin Haase's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Robin Haase Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 2006 2/2 4.5 3.5 53.2% 65.4% 47.5% 61.3% 35.1% 57.3% 37.1% 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 2007 21/21 6.0 2.6 58.8% 72.4% 49.9% 65.1% 35.8% 63.2% 32.7% 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 2008 25/25 6.2 2.8 60.6% 71.7% 52.6% 62.0% 44.7% 64.0% 36.9% 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2010 17/17 7.0 3.2 59.3% 74.1% 50.5% 62.0% 40.6% 64.4% 34.2% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2011 49/49 7.4 2.7 59.2% 70.7% 50.2% 54.4% 44.3% 62.4% 38.8% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2012 41/42 5.5 2.4 58.5% 72.6% 46.9% 47.4% 37.9% 61.7% 37.1% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2013 54/54 6.0 2.8 61.7% 71.8% 48.2% 61.4% 47.5% 62.7% 35.6% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2014 38/38 5.3 2.4 60.9% 69.7% 48.8% 55.8% 38.6% 61.5% 33.7% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2015 34/34 5.1 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 50.4% 56.7% 44.6% 61.3% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 33/34 6.6 2.4 59.0% 73.3% 49.0% 58.2% 47.0% 63.4% 35.7% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2017 54/54 7.3 3.0 59.3% 73.4% 51.1% 58.4% 40.5% 64.4% 36.8% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2018 52/52 7.5 3.0 57.4% 72.4% 49.4% 53.7% 46.8% 62.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 29/29 6.8 3.8 56.1% 73.7% 48.7% 63.8% 38.8% 62.6% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1/1 12.0 4.0 56.3% 76.2% 51.0% 80.0% 28.6% 65.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 4/4 9.0 2.3 60.3% 73.8% 53.9% 65.6% 55.2% 65.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1/1 6.0 3.0 58.8% 75.0% 25.0% 78.6% — 54.4% 18.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2/2 9.5 1.5 54.5% 71.2% 52.3% 48.5% 45.0% 62.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 457/460 6.5 2.8 59.3% 72.0% 49.5% 57.5% 42.7% 62.8% 35.7% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin Haase Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 2006 1489 110.0 +2.06 -3.84 0.869 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 — — -0.29 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2007 1619 121.1 0.00 -2.69 0.888 48.7% -29 -30 — 43.1% -0.45 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.09 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2008 1673 135.7 +0.43 +0.59 1.024 50.3% +64 -65 -158 48.4% -0.16 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.68 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) — +0.27
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.54
23 2010 1692 132.9 +0.65 -0.48 0.961 49.0% +64 — -133 40.0% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.36 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2011 1779 144.3 -0.26 +1.34 1.032 50.6% -48 -6 -138 54.4% +0.30 8–12 (40%) 8–16 (33%) — +0.39 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.74
25 2012 1697 141.9 -0.74 -0.01 0.971 49.2% -73 +151 -117 38.8% -0.40 4–8 (33%) 1–9 (10%) — -0.26 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.61
26 2013 1852 144.6 -0.82 -0.70 0.956 49.6% -121 +73 -285 47.5% +0.05 17–8 (68%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.40 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
27 2014 1716 132.5 -1.56 -2.99 0.876 48.1% -36 +47 -94 42.6% -0.32 8–6 (57%) 1–11 (8%) — +0.05 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.71
28 2015 1767 135.3 -1.96 -1.52 0.880 47.9% -87 -38 -12 41.8% -0.60 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1748 137.6 -0.31 -0.60 0.974 49.3% -40 -10 -34 43.5% -0.38 5–5 (50%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.19 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2017 1810 158.9 +1.47 +0.65 1.034 50.5% -8 -56 -118 49.3% +0.01 7–14 (33%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.52 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2018 1780 146.8 -0.97 +0.09 0.953 49.4% +10 -86 -41 47.2% -0.18 13–14 (48%) 16–14 (53%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 1686 131.3 -1.19 -1.16 0.924 48.7% +34 -63 +43 40.5% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1662 110.2 +0.76 -2.31 0.931 49.1% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1616 115.8 +0.38 -0.57 0.999 49.2% +49 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–1 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1569 100.6 -4.87 -1.01 0.399 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1533 107.7 -0.45 +0.21 0.935 48.9% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 2–0 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1522 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1861 145.6 -0.45 -0.47 0.959 49.4% -26 +15 -87 45.3% -0.23 85–97 (47%) 81–123 (40%) 95.3 -0.03 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.