H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Robin Haase vs Yuki Bhambri H2H: 1-0
Robin Haase holds a 1–0 lead over Yuki Bhambri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Haase won the 2013 Chennai third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2013* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Robin Haase | 7-5 6-3 | Yuki Bhambri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yuki Bhambri | #1,185 | #83 | 688 | 1,747 | 15 | 26 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Haase | Yuki Bhambri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #505 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #249 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #93 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #116 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1048 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #551 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |