H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Robin Soderling vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0

Robin Soderling holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2010 Valencia round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin Soderling
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robin Soderling #5 6-2 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #59 Match data Nov 4, 2010* R16 Valencia ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,174 285 168 62.9% 0 1 0 2 7 10
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin Soderling Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2004 31–27 53.4% #34 1,819 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,832 0 2 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2008 40–20 66.7% #17 1,948 0 3 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,097 0 4 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,121 0 6 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin Soderling Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 17 15 32 53.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 10 6 16 62.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 25 13 38 65.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 35 15 50 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2011 19 3 22 86.4% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 167 96 263 63.5% 71 49 120 59.2% 26 17 43 60.5% 21 6 27 77.8% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/453 of Robin Soderling's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Robin Soderling Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2001 2/2 9.5 2.5 52.3% 71.3% 58.2% 71.4% 35.7% 65.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 6/6 4.8 4.3 58.0% 66.6% 41.7% 46.1% 39.1% 55.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 16/16 8.3 3.6 63.7% 75.0% 52.8% 51.7% 47.9% 66.8% 37.6% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2004 57/58 7.0 2.7 61.3% 73.0% 51.4% 58.5% 46.7% 64.6% 36.9% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2005 34/34 9.2 3.9 60.0% 73.1% 48.6% 68.0% 44.5% 63.4% 36.0% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2006 55/55 6.7 2.9 63.4% 75.9% 53.4% 67.2% 42.2% 67.7% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 37/37 7.4 2.6 62.3% 74.9% 51.0% 56.6% 46.1% 65.9% 40.1% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2008 59/60 10.5 2.8 61.8% 79.9% 55.0% 70.2% 44.2% 70.4% 37.9% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2009 64/67 8.9 2.8 59.7% 78.3% 56.0% 64.4% 46.8% 69.2% 39.0% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2010 75/75 9.9 3.3 59.2% 78.3% 52.6% 66.0% 45.1% 67.7% 39.4% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2011 43/43 8.0 2.7 62.9% 76.0% 54.4% 56.9% 46.3% 67.9% 40.3% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 448/453 8.5 3.0 61.2% 76.3% 53.0% 63.3% 45.2% 67.2% 38.5% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin Soderling Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1519 112.1 +0.27 +0.13 1.047 50.2% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1554 115.3 -3.43 -0.70 0.809 46.1% +62 -67 — 31.3% -1.25 0–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1729 131.0 +1.72 +1.37 1.132 52.0% -13 — -32 57.1% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.25 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2004 1820 148.4 +1.68 +0.70 1.041 50.8% +14 -282 -138 53.4% +0.31 9–12 (43%) 16–13 (55%) — -3.53 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2005 1738 135.0 +0.73 -0.84 0.986 49.9% +56 -187 -96 49.4% +0.06 5–4 (56%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.02 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2006 1823 152.2 +4.87 +2.04 1.200 52.9% 0 -152 -111 59.2% +0.64 8–10 (44%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.90 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1832 149.5 +2.84 +2.66 1.176 52.9% +14 -116 -76 60.2% +0.80 8–8 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.51 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2008 1948 162.9 +6.87 +1.96 1.279 53.7% +29 -144 -139 62.9% +1.10 11–6 (65%) 8–17 (32%) — -3.43 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2009 2098 167.1 +5.93 +3.27 1.268 53.8% -49 -40 -206 63.7% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.00 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2010 2122 171.5 +4.91 +4.01 1.222 53.4% -9 +7 -147 65.3% +1.12 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.54 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2011 2128 166.5 +4.27 +3.85 1.257 53.8% +23 +78 -111 71.2% +1.27 8–1 (89%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.37 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2175 163.7 +4.10 +2.30 1.175 52.7% +5 -76 -120 60.7% +0.79 72–60 (55%) 96–105 (48%) 99.2 -2.84 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.