H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Robin Soderling vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 2-0
Robin Soderling holds a 2–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2010 US Open third round 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Robin Soderling | 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2010* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Robin Soderling | 6-1 6-4 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin Soderling | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |