H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Rod Frawley vs Eddie Dibbs H2H: 0-3

Eddie Dibbs holds a 3–0 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eddie Dibbs leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1982 Forest Hills Wct round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rod Frawley
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Eddie Dibbs
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eddie Dibbs #22 6-3 6-2 Rod Frawley #46 Match data May 5, 1982* R32 Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 Clay
Eddie Dibbs #16 6-1 6-4 Rod Frawley #69 Match data Feb 19, 1981* R32 La Quinta ATP 250 Hard
Eddie Dibbs #9 6-0 6-2 Rod Frawley #49 Match data Apr 12, 1980* QF Houston ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rod Frawley #483 #43 0 1,814 112 143 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eddie Dibbs #798 #5 0 2,169 605 262 69.8% 0 0 0 1 21 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rod Frawley Eddie Dibbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,448 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 3–5 37.5% — 1,435 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 4–6 40.0% — 1,460 0 0 1970 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1971 7–4 63.6% — 1,601 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1972 5–9 35.7% — 1,608 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1973 40–19 67.8% #28 1,857 0 3
23 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,478 0 0 1974 61–29 67.8% #22 1,909 0 4
24 1977 3–10 23.1% #207 1,419 0 0 1975 53–25 67.9% #18 2,055 0 6
25 1978 7–15 31.8% #142 1,505 0 0 1976 83–28 74.8% #9 2,058 0 10
26 1979 11–15 42.3% #86 1,583 0 0 1977 77–28 73.3% #7 2,056 0 13
27 1980 29–23 55.8% #44 1,774 0 0 1978 82–27 75.2% #6 1,999 0 17
28 1981 20–24 45.5% #89 1,752 0 0 1979 62–21 74.7% #10 2,039 0 18
29 1982 22–23 48.9% #87 1,686 0 1 1980 49–21 70.0% #12 1,930 0 20
30 1983 10–14 41.7% #100 1,597 0 1 1981 41–17 70.7% #25 1,977 0 22
31 1984 1–3 25.0% #385 1,576 0 1 1982 26–18 59.1% #55 1,797 0 22
32 — — — — — — — 1983 16–10 61.5% #90 1,819 0 22
33 — — — — — — — 1984 1–5 16.7% #351 1,750 0 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rod Frawley Eddie Dibbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1970 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 17 5 22 77.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1976 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1974 14 8 22 63.6% 30 12 42 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
24 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 7 6 13 53.8% 36 13 49 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
25 1978 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 6 3 9 66.7% 61 15 76 80.3% — — — — 16 10 26 61.5%
26 1979 5 8 13 38.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 20 5 25 80.0% 43 13 56 76.8% — — — — 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1980 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 1978 8 3 11 72.7% 40 9 49 81.6% — — — — 34 15 49 69.4%
28 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8% 1979 15 5 20 75.0% 37 10 47 78.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5%
29 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 34 9 43 79.1% — — — — 10 9 19 52.6%
30 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 32 10 42 76.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 19 10 29 65.5% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 35 59 40.7% 17 28 45 37.8% 56 51 107 52.3% 15 29 44 34.1% — 104 48 152 68.4% 376 133 509 73.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 119 75 194 61.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rod Frawley Eddie Dibbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1480 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1448 91.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1435 97.3 — — — — +44 — +62 31.6% -1.11 — 0–2 — +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1461 104.7 — — — — +33 — +47 45.8% -0.46 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 +0.88 1970 1523 107.1 — — — — — +35 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — +0.27
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1602 117.2 — — — — — +55 — 59.1% +0.36 1–1 — — +0.56
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1608 116.6 — — — — -61 +29 — 42.9% -0.63 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.3 +0.10
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1858 140.0 — — — — +9 -48 -291 63.2% +0.94 5–5 (50%) 11–7 (61%) 104.8 +0.92
23 1976 1478 107.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–0 — +0.07 1974 1910 146.5 — — — — -22 +35 -294 63.6% +0.99 16–10 (62%) 11–8 (58%) 104.0 -2.77
24 1977 1419 104.2 — — — — +46 — +53 28.1% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.55 1975 2056 157.2 — — — — -104 +48 — 65.7% +1.13 11–8 (58%) 3–9 (25%) 96.4 -5.91
25 1978 1506 130.8 — — — — — +23 +24 33.9% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 101.3 -0.84 1976 2058 167.1 — — — — -86 +115 — 65.7% +1.08 27–8 (77%) 22–17 (56%) 106.1 -5.66
26 1979 1584 123.2 — — — — -108 -25 -1 47.2% -0.06 5–8 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +1.69 1977 2056 168.2 — — — — +21 +52 — 67.2% +1.16 18–9 (67%) 14–11 (56%) 102.8 -7.02
27 1980 1775 142.4 — — — — -97 -151 -51 53.8% +0.06 13–9 (59%) 14–6 (70%) 114.9 -0.59 1978 2000 165.9 — — — — +10 +123 — 69.4% +1.41 20–10 (67%) 17–14 (55%) 100.1 -2.88
28 1981 1752 129.5 — — — — -133 -186 +83 47.1% -0.15 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 102.3 +0.07 1979 2039 164.3 — — — — -15 +95 — 68.0% +1.20 17–6 (74%) 10–5 (67%) 108.1 -4.95
29 1982 1687 132.2 — — — — -50 -111 +112 47.0% -0.50 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) 109.6 -1.34 1980 1931 156.9 — — — — -20 +110 — 64.6% +1.22 14–4 (78%) 9–3 (75%) 107.8 -1.24
30 1983 1597 116.8 — — — — +21 0 +66 44.1% -0.39 3–5 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 +1.26 1981 1978 155.3 — — — — -115 +66 — 66.4% +1.15 10–8 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 96.7 -1.84
31 1984 1577 104.3 — — — — +18 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — +0.45 1982 1797 140.9 — — — — -37 +129 — 58.8% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 6–4 (60%) 95.8 -1.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1820 147.9 — — — — — +84 — 55.0% +0.37 9–1 (90%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.74
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1750 119.5 — — — — — +67 — 33.3% -1.00 0–3 (0%) — — -0.74
Career — 1815 131.3 — — — — -67 -74 +48 44.8% -0.43 45–44 (51%) 51–41 (55%) 109.6 +1.67 — 2169 162.2 — — — — -26 +76 -293 64.8% +1.05 151–81 (65%) 113–88 (56%) 105.5 -3.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.