H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rod Frawley vs Eddie Dibbs H2H: 0-3
Eddie Dibbs holds a 3–0 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eddie Dibbs leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1982 Forest Hills Wct third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1982* | Forest Hills Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 6-3 6-2 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1981* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Eddie Dibbs | 6-1 6-4 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1980* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 6-0 6-2 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rod Frawley | Eddie Dibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 |