H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rod Frawley vs Frank Sedgman H2H: 0-1
Frank Sedgman holds a 1–0 lead over Rod Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Sedgman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Frank Sedgman won the 1971 Melbourne second round 7-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 98
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1971* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Frank Sedgman | 7-6 6-3 6-1 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Frank Sedgman | #662 | #237 | 0 | 1,655 | 26 | 31 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rod Frawley | Frank Sedgman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #318 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |