H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Rod Frawley vs Ross Case H2H: 1-0
Rod Frawley holds a 1–0 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rod Frawley leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rod Frawley won the 1972 Hong Kong fourth round 3-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1972* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Rod Frawley | 3-6 6-0 6-2 | Ross Case | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rod Frawley | Ross Case | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |