H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC

Roger Federer vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 0-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Roger Federer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2000 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(3) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Francisco Clavet #43 7-6(3) 7-6(4) Roger Federer #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —