H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Roger Federer vs Milos Raonic H2H: 12-3
Roger Federer holds a 12–3 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Roger Federer leads 7–2 on hard courts and 4–1 on grass. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2018 Paris Masters third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
12
–
3
15 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2018* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | (w/o) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2018* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-4 7-6(3) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-2 7-6(4) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-7(3) 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2016* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-4 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2015* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 7-5 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2015* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Nov 9, 2014 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-1 7-6(0) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2014* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Roger Federer | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2014* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-2 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-4 7-6(4) 6-2 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2012* | Halle | ATP 500 | QF | Grass | Roger Federer | 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| May 9, 2012* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Roger Federer | 4-6 7-5 7-6(4) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Roger Federer | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | #97 | #1 | 12,315 | 2,430 | 1,206 | 267 | 81.9% | 20 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 27 | 103 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Federer | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #301 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1999 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 55–22 | 71.4% | #6 | 1,944 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 74–16 | 82.2% | #2 | 2,104 | 1 | 11 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,301 | 4 | 22 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 80–4 | 95.2% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 33 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 90–5 | 94.7% | #1 | 2,401 | 9 | 45 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #1 | 2,330 | 12 | 53 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2008 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,198 | 13 | 57 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2009 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #1 | 2,259 | 15 | 61 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2010 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #2 | 2,311 | 16 | 66 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2011 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,340 | 16 | 70 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2012 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #2 | 2,347 | 17 | 76 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2013 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,189 | 17 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #2 | 2,343 | 17 | 82 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2015 | 61–11 | 84.7% | #3 | 2,398 | 17 | 88 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2016 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #16 | 2,283 | 17 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 53–5 | 91.4% | #2 | 2,385 | 19 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 49–10 | 83.1% | #3 | 2,261 | 20 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 53–11 | 82.8% | #3 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #5 | 2,240 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #16 | 2,128 | 20 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |