H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Roger Federer vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 2-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 3–2 lead over Roger Federer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Roger Federer won the 2003 Rotterdam third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2003* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Roger Federer #5 3-6 6-3 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #71 Match data
Mar 16, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #22 6-4 6-3 Roger Federer #14 Match data
Feb 22, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Roger Federer #13 (w/o) Thomas Enqvist #20 Match data
Oct 29, 2000* Basel ATP 250 F Carpet Thomas Enqvist #6 6-2 4-6 7-6(4) 1-6 6-1 Roger Federer #34 Match data
Jan 7, 2000* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #4 7-6(5) 6-4 Roger Federer #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roger Federer Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19
32 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82 — — — — — — —
33 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88 — — — — — — —
34 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88 — — — — — — —
35 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95 — — — — — — —
36 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99 — — — — — — —
37 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
38 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103 — — — — — — —
39 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103 — — — — — — —