H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roger Taylor vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 2-1
Roger Taylor holds a 2–1 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Roger Taylor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roger Taylor won the 1977 Baltimore third round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 84
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1977* | Baltimore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Roger Taylor | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1976* | Cologne | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Vladimir Zednik | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Roger Taylor | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1971* | Sacramento | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roger Taylor | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Taylor | #372 | #11 | 0 | 2,004 | 369 | 296 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roger Taylor | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1968 | 27–51 | 34.6% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1969 | 49–31 | 61.2% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1970 | 62–37 | 62.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1971 | 44–37 | 54.3% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,901 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1973 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1974 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #42 | 1,849 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1975 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #52 | 1,797 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #80 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1977 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,602 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,552 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,519 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |