H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Roscoe Tanner vs Eddie Dibbs H2H: 6-4

Roscoe Tanner holds a 6–4 lead over Eddie Dibbs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Roscoe Tanner leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1979 Philadelphia round of 16 6-7 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 4
10 main draw meetings
Eddie Dibbs
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner #11 6-7 6-2 6-2 Eddie Dibbs #5 Match data Jan 26, 1979* R16 Philadelphia ATP 250 Carpet
Eddie Dibbs 7-6 6-7 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data Sep 30, 1978* QF San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner #25 7-6 5-7 6-4 6-1 Eddie Dibbs #6 Match data Jan 28, 1978* SF Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Eddie Dibbs 6-4 7-5 Roscoe Tanner Match data Dec 5, 1976 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Roscoe Tanner 7-6 6-3 Eddie Dibbs Match data Jul 19, 1976* F Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay
Roscoe Tanner 6-1 6-7(6) 7-5 Eddie Dibbs Match data Feb 28, 1976* R16 Fort Worth Wct ATP 250 Hard
Eddie Dibbs 7-5 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data Jul 25, 1975* R16 Washington ATP 250 Clay
Roscoe Tanner 7-6(5) 7-5 Eddie Dibbs Match data Apr 5, 1974* SF Palm Desert Wct ATP 250 Hard
Eddie Dibbs #41 7-6 6-3 Roscoe Tanner #22 Match data Oct 12, 1973* SF Fort Worth ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner 6-2 6-4 Eddie Dibbs Match data Jul 19, 1973* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17
Eddie Dibbs #798 #5 0 2,169 605 262 69.8% 0 0 0 1 21 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roscoe Tanner Eddie Dibbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0 1970 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
20 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0 1971 7–4 63.6% — 1,601 0 0
21 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0 1972 5–9 35.7% — 1,608 0 0
22 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2 1973 40–19 67.8% #28 1,857 0 3
23 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5 1974 61–29 67.8% #22 1,909 0 4
24 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9 1975 53–25 67.9% #18 2,055 0 6
25 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11 1976 83–28 74.8% #9 2,058 0 10
26 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13 1977 77–28 73.3% #7 2,056 0 13
27 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15 1978 82–27 75.2% #6 1,999 0 17
28 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16 1979 62–21 74.7% #10 2,039 0 18
29 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17 1980 49–21 70.0% #12 1,930 0 20
30 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17 1981 41–17 70.7% #25 1,977 0 22
31 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17 1982 26–18 59.1% #55 1,797 0 22
32 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17 1983 16–10 61.5% #90 1,819 0 22
33 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17 1984 1–5 16.7% #351 1,750 0 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roscoe Tanner Eddie Dibbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1971 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5% 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1973 17 5 22 77.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1974 14 8 22 63.6% 30 12 42 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
24 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 1975 7 6 13 53.8% 36 13 49 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
25 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1976 6 3 9 66.7% 61 15 76 80.3% — — — — 16 10 26 61.5%
26 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5% 1977 20 5 25 80.0% 43 13 56 76.8% — — — — 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4% 1978 8 3 11 72.7% 40 9 49 81.6% — — — — 34 15 49 69.4%
28 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1979 15 5 20 75.0% 37 10 47 78.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5%
29 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4% 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 34 9 43 79.1% — — — — 10 9 19 52.6%
30 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 32 10 42 76.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 19 10 29 65.5% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2% — 104 48 152 68.4% 376 133 509 73.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 119 75 194 61.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roscoe Tanner Eddie Dibbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17 1970 1523 107.1 — — — — — +35 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — +0.27
20 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27 1971 1602 117.2 — — — — — +55 — 59.1% +0.36 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40 1972 1608 116.6 — — — — -61 +29 — 42.9% -0.63 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.10
22 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27 1973 1858 140.0 — — — — +9 -48 -291 63.2% +0.94 5–5 (50%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.92
23 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74 1974 1910 146.5 — — — — -22 +35 -294 63.6% +0.99 16–10 (62%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.77
24 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11 1975 2056 157.2 — — — — -104 +48 — 65.7% +1.13 11–8 (58%) 3–9 (25%) — -5.91
25 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49 1976 2058 167.1 — — — — -86 +115 — 65.7% +1.08 27–8 (77%) 22–17 (56%) — -5.66
26 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59 1977 2056 168.2 — — — — +21 +52 — 67.2% +1.16 18–9 (67%) 14–11 (56%) — -7.02
27 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91 1978 2000 165.9 — — — — +10 +123 — 69.4% +1.41 20–10 (67%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.88
28 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79 1979 2039 164.3 — — — — -15 +95 — 68.0% +1.20 17–6 (74%) 10–5 (67%) — -4.95
29 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51 1980 1931 156.9 — — — — -20 +110 — 64.6% +1.22 14–4 (78%) 9–3 (75%) — -1.24
30 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07 1981 1978 155.3 — — — — -115 +66 — 66.4% +1.15 10–8 (56%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.84
31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29 1982 1797 140.9 — — — — -37 +129 — 58.8% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.22
32 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69 1983 1820 147.9 — — — — — +84 — 55.0% +0.37 9–1 (90%) 3–2 (60%) — -1.74
33 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08 1984 1750 119.5 — — — — — +67 — 33.3% -1.00 0–3 (0%) — — -0.74
Career — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84 — 2169 162.2 — — — — -26 +76 -293 64.8% +1.05 151–81 (65%) 113–88 (56%) 105.5 -3.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.