H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Haroon Rahim H2H: 2-1
Roy Emerson holds a 2–1 lead over Haroon Rahim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Roy Emerson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1972 Gothenberg Wct quarterfinal 6-4 4-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PAK
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1972* | Gothenberg Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Roy Emerson | 6-4 4-6 7-6 | Haroon Rahim | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1972* | Midland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Haroon Rahim | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Roy Emerson | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1971* | Berkeley | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Roy Emerson | 6-3 6-4 | Haroon Rahim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Haroon Rahim | #130 | #34 | 0 | 1,855 | 148 | 176 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Haroon Rahim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 32–38 | 45.7% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 20–34 | 37.0% | #90 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |