H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Roy Emerson vs Roy Barth H2H: 2-0
Roy Emerson holds a 2–0 lead over Roy Barth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roy Emerson leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1970 Salisbury second round 9-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1970* | Salisbury | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Roy Emerson | 9-7 6-4 | Roy Barth | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Roy Emerson | 6-3 6-0 6-3 | Roy Barth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Roy Barth | #373 | #107 | 0 | 1,736 | 64 | 138 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roy Emerson | Roy Barth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–11 | 59.3% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 6–29 | 17.1% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–26 | 3.7% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–21 | 16.0% | #126 | 1,370 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #136 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |