H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ruben Bemelmans vs Amer Delic

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ruben Bemelmans vs Amer Delic.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ruben Bemelmans
BEL Age 38 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Amer Delic
BIH Age 44 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruben Bemelmans #133 7-6(5) 6-2 Amer Delic #239 Match data May 27, 2012 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ruben Bemelmans #1,092 #84 628 1,756 23 49 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amer Delic #1,041 #60 728 1,718 25 53 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Amer Delic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2003 1–3 25.0% #447 1,484 0 0
22 2010 1–4 20.0% #178 1,597 0 0 2004 2–5 28.6% #173 1,502 0 0
23 2011 1–3 25.0% #160 1,634 0 0 2005 1–4 20.0% #164 1,495 0 0
24 2012 3–6 33.3% #111 1,648 0 0 2006 1–3 25.0% #93 1,489 0 0
25 2013 3–5 37.5% #148 1,637 0 0 2007 9–24 27.3% #140 1,523 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2008 8–7 53.3% #137 1,623 0 0
27 2015 3–8 27.3% #108 1,695 0 0 2009 3–5 37.5% #219 1,607 0 0
28 2016 2–2 50.0% #167 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 5–5 50.0% #118 1,694 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #213 1,555 0 0
30 2018 5–14 26.3% #117 1,686 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #407 1,524 0 0
31 2019 0–2 0.0% #260 1,590 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Amer Delic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2012 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2007 6 17 23 26.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2015 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2016 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2018 3 11 14 21.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 32 48 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0% — 22 41 63 34.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 6 8 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Amer Delic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 15.5 4.3 62.6% 74.6% 48.8% 40.5% 27.8% 64.9% 26.3%
22 2010 5/5 7.0 1.0 67.7% 70.3% 43.5% 71.5% 35.7% 61.8% 32.4% 2004 7/7 8.7 4.9 57.8% 67.1% 46.0% 52.5% 53.6% 58.3% 31.6%
23 2011 4/4 4.5 4.5 58.7% 73.6% 49.1% 67.8% 37.1% 63.3% 34.2% 2005 5/5 6.8 2.6 58.4% 68.1% 54.5% 65.2% 23.7% 62.3% 34.0%
24 2012 9/9 5.7 3.7 60.7% 68.7% 48.3% 56.0% 49.7% 60.7% 35.4% 2006 4/4 10.5 5.5 54.1% 71.0% 50.0% 52.4% 33.3% 61.2% 33.4%
25 2013 8/8 8.0 3.3 65.0% 73.1% 50.6% 69.6% 37.6% 65.5% 36.9% 2007 33/33 10.1 2.1 58.7% 72.3% 50.1% 61.7% 34.2% 63.3% 31.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 15/15 8.7 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 52.5% 77.4% 41.0% 65.5% 33.8%
27 2015 11/11 7.3 4.5 62.0% 72.0% 51.2% 51.1% 35.3% 64.2% 30.8% 2009 8/8 15.9 3.9 61.9% 73.3% 55.0% 71.6% 28.3% 66.1% 29.5%
28 2016 4/4 6.5 2.3 68.6% 65.9% 50.7% 76.7% 55.0% 61.0% 31.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 10/10 6.6 2.4 65.3% 68.5% 53.9% 53.6% 31.4% 63.1% 32.1% 2011 1/1 8.0 1.0 56.1% 62.5% 48.0% 50.0% 0.0% 56.1% 22.9%
30 2018 19/19 5.8 3.2 65.4% 66.5% 47.0% 59.4% 38.4% 59.9% 33.4% 2012 1/1 10.0 4.0 64.5% 63.3% 27.3% 66.7% 75.0% 50.5% 37.1%
31 2019 2/2 0.5 1.5 65.5% 57.5% 42.9% 48.7% 25.0% 52.5% 28.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Amer Delic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2009 1500 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1485 106.9 -0.21 -2.21 0.750 46.1% +14 — — 38.5% -0.85 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.13
22 2010 1597 122.5 +0.88 -0.33 0.848 47.3% +32 — — 38.5% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 2004 1503 109.8 -1.70 -1.38 0.758 45.6% +10 — — 36.8% -1.05 1–1 — — -0.03
23 2011 1634 112.3 +0.10 -0.35 0.931 49.4% — — +60 46.2% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05 2005 1495 112.0 -0.01 -1.82 0.902 47.4% +16 — — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–1 — -0.26
24 2012 1648 118.1 -1.91 -0.07 0.901 48.3% -38 — +135 40.0% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.13 2006 1490 105.4 -1.79 -0.86 0.861 46.6% +19 — — 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.15
25 2013 1638 125.5 +0.65 0.00 1.070 51.5% +20 — — 42.9% +0.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.14 2007 1523 126.6 +0.35 -3.94 0.856 47.6% -16 +13 +21 34.5% -0.75 2–7 (22%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.06
26 2014 1628 113.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1623 120.3 +1.72 -1.98 0.980 50.2% +30 — — 51.4% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.57
27 2015 1695 124.5 -1.03 -1.29 0.860 47.4% +26 — — 27.6% -1.28 0–2 2–4 (33%) — -0.88 2009 1608 123.2 +1.60 -2.31 0.868 48.2% +134 — — 44.4% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.41
28 2016 1646 110.6 -0.49 -2.17 0.800 48.0% +6 — — 46.2% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.19 2010 1588 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1694 125.7 -0.20 -0.85 0.870 48.1% -61 — +90 41.9% -0.45 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.25 2011 1555 107.2 -2.06 -1.27 0.523 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
30 2018 1686 128.9 -2.91 -1.28 0.833 47.2% -22 — +111 35.2% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.61 2012 1525 108.3 -0.57 -0.92 0.750 45.2% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.04
31 2019 1590 108.5 -1.92 +0.26 0.590 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1599 107.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1552 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1518 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 123.9 -1.13 -0.82 0.871 48.0% -8 — +101 37.3% -0.70 9–20 (31%) 15–23 (39%) 89.1 -2.74 — 1719 122.8 +0.35 -2.71 0.860 47.7% +18 +13 +21 38.3% -0.73 9–18 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 95.4 -0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.