Ruben Bemelmans
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 3, 2019 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 18, 2018 | H2H |
| John Isner | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Lucas Pouille | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Joao Sousa | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 21, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Ruben Bemelmans vs Denis Gremelmayr H2H: 1-0
Ruben Bemelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Gremelmayr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Bemelmans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2011 Newport round of 32 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Bemelmans | 6-4 6-2 | Denis Gremelmayr | Match data | Jul 7, 2011* | R32 | Newport | ATP 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,756 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denis Gremelmayr | #1,512 | #59 | 1,042 | 1,761 | 32 | 57 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruben Bemelmans | Denis Gremelmayr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #235 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #538 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ruben Bemelmans | Denis Gremelmayr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2012 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2006 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2015 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2009 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 30 | 2018 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 16 | 32 | 48 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | 16 | 34 | 50 | 32.0% | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 72/72 of Ruben Bemelmans's and 88/89 of Denis Gremelmayr's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ruben Bemelmans | Denis Gremelmayr | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 59.3% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 55.9% | 24.5% |
| 22 | 2010 | 5/5 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 67.7% | 70.3% | 43.5% | 71.5% | 35.7% | 61.8% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 4/4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 58.7% | 73.6% | 49.1% | 67.8% | 37.1% | 63.3% | 34.2% | 2005 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 59.9% | 69.3% | 53.2% | 47.5% | 30.6% | 62.3% | 38.1% |
| 24 | 2012 | 9/9 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 60.7% | 68.7% | 48.3% | 56.0% | 49.7% | 60.7% | 35.4% | 2006 | 18/18 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 56.5% | 67.7% | 49.9% | 49.3% | 41.1% | 59.8% | 38.5% |
| 25 | 2013 | 8/8 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 65.0% | 73.1% | 50.6% | 69.6% | 37.6% | 65.5% | 36.9% | 2007 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 59.7% | 66.9% | 36.9% | 50.5% | 8.3% | 54.3% | 27.3% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 34/35 | 5.2 | 2.9 | 57.8% | 67.0% | 50.1% | 60.2% | 44.8% | 60.0% | 34.6% |
| 27 | 2015 | 11/11 | 7.3 | 4.5 | 62.0% | 72.0% | 51.2% | 51.1% | 35.3% | 64.2% | 30.8% | 2009 | 11/11 | 1.9 | 3.5 | 56.5% | 60.1% | 46.1% | 48.3% | 32.5% | 53.7% | 33.8% |
| 28 | 2016 | 4/4 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 68.6% | 65.9% | 50.7% | 76.7% | 55.0% | 61.0% | 31.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 10/10 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 65.3% | 68.5% | 53.9% | 53.6% | 31.4% | 63.1% | 32.1% | 2011 | 14/14 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 57.7% | 64.4% | 49.8% | 58.3% | 36.8% | 58.3% | 31.6% |
| 30 | 2018 | 19/19 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 65.4% | 66.5% | 47.0% | 59.4% | 38.4% | 59.9% | 33.4% | 2012 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 62.5% | 67.1% | 41.8% | 76.7% | 25.0% | 57.6% | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2019 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 65.5% | 57.5% | 42.9% | 48.7% | 25.0% | 52.5% | 28.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 72/72 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 64.2% | 69.0% | 49.1% | 60.0% | 38.6% | 61.9% | 33.2% | — | 88/89 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 57.7% | 65.9% | 48.9% | 55.4% | 38.0% | 58.6% | 34.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ruben Bemelmans | Denis Gremelmayr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1484 | 96.8 | -1.63 | -3.40 | 0.556 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.22 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1500 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 1597 | 122.5 | +0.88 | -0.33 | 0.848 | 47.3% | +32 | — | — | 38.5% | -0.62 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 95.3 | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 1634 | 112.3 | +0.10 | -0.35 | 0.931 | 49.4% | — | — | +60 | 46.2% | -0.61 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.05 | 2005 | 1491 | 117.1 | -1.10 | +1.21 | 1.008 | 49.1% | +33 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.78 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.03 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1648 | 118.1 | -1.91 | -0.07 | 0.901 | 48.3% | -38 | — | +135 | 40.0% | -0.64 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | -0.13 | 2006 | 1611 | 127.1 | -0.95 | -0.10 | 0.958 | 49.2% | +7 | -29 | — | 47.8% | -0.28 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.2 | -0.67 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1638 | 125.5 | +0.65 | 0.00 | 1.070 | 51.5% | +20 | — | — | 42.9% | +0.29 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.3 | +0.14 | 2007 | 1558 | 109.2 | -2.39 | -1.40 | 0.597 | 41.1% | +50 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.40 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1628 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1623 | 129.2 | -2.60 | -0.92 | 0.864 | 47.7% | -12 | +33 | -136 | 42.0% | -0.48 | 8–5 (62%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.7 | -1.03 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1695 | 124.5 | -1.03 | -1.29 | 0.860 | 47.4% | +26 | — | — | 27.6% | -1.28 | 0–2 | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.88 | 2009 | 1555 | 105.4 | -5.81 | -1.62 | 0.730 | 44.0% | -4 | +50 | — | 19.2% | -2.42 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.6 | +0.07 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1646 | 110.6 | -0.49 | -2.17 | 0.800 | 48.0% | +6 | — | — | 46.2% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.19 | 2010 | 1512 | 92.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1694 | 125.7 | -0.20 | -0.85 | 0.870 | 48.1% | -61 | — | +90 | 41.9% | -0.45 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–4 (43%) | 105.5 | -0.25 | 2011 | 1587 | 111.0 | -2.91 | -3.57 | 0.758 | 45.1% | -48 | +77 | -109 | 29.0% | -1.68 | 2–1 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.8 | +0.24 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1686 | 128.9 | -2.91 | -1.28 | 0.833 | 47.2% | -22 | — | +111 | 35.2% | -0.89 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–7 (36%) | 93.4 | -0.61 | 2012 | 1594 | 122.7 | +1.57 | +2.03 | 0.784 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.28 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1590 | 108.5 | -1.92 | +0.26 | 0.590 | 40.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.40 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1599 | 107.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1552 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1518 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1756 | 123.9 | -1.13 | -0.82 | 0.871 | 48.0% | -8 | — | +101 | 37.3% | -0.70 | 9–20 (31%) | 15–23 (39%) | 89.1 | -2.74 | — | 1761 | 123.4 | -2.53 | -1.15 | 0.834 | 46.9% | -3 | +25 | -118 | 36.4% | -0.99 | 14–11 (56%) | 16–15 (52%) | 106.6 | -2.04 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Denis Gremelmayr
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Baghdatis | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 17, 2011 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 26, 2009 | H2H |
| Michael Llodra | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 5, 2012 | H2H |
| Potito Starace | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 4, 2012 | H2H |