H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ruben Bemelmans vs Vincent Millot

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Ruben Bemelmans vs Vincent Millot.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ruben Bemelmans
BEL Age 38 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Vincent Millot
FRA Age 40 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vincent Millot #196 6-0 3-6 6-4 Ruben Bemelmans #116 Match data Feb 15, 2016 Q1 Q Marseille ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ruben Bemelmans #1,092 #84 628 1,756 23 49 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vincent Millot #1,400 #135 442 1,682 8 22 26.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Vincent Millot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2010 1–4 20.0% #178 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 1–3 25.0% #160 1,634 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #217 1,552 0 0
24 2012 3–6 33.3% #111 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2013 3–5 37.5% #148 1,637 0 0 2011 0–4 0.0% #176 1,556 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 1–1 50.0% #210 1,617 0 0
27 2015 3–8 27.3% #108 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 2–2 50.0% #167 1,645 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #154 1,581 0 0
29 2017 5–5 50.0% #118 1,694 0 0 2015 0–3 0.0% #178 1,633 0 0
30 2018 5–14 26.3% #117 1,686 0 0 2016 3–4 42.9% #143 1,616 0 0
31 2019 0–2 0.0% #260 1,590 0 0 2017 2–5 28.6% #188 1,653 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #321 1,654 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Vincent Millot
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2015 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2017 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2018 3 11 14 21.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
31 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 32 48 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0% — 8 18 26 30.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Vincent Millot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 5/5 7.0 1.0 67.7% 70.3% 43.5% 71.5% 35.7% 61.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 4/4 4.5 4.5 58.7% 73.6% 49.1% 67.8% 37.1% 63.3% 34.2% 2009 2/2 3.5 1.5 57.2% 68.3% 36.4% 40.3% 58.3% 55.1% 29.3%
24 2012 9/9 5.7 3.7 60.7% 68.7% 48.3% 56.0% 49.7% 60.7% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 8/8 8.0 3.3 65.0% 73.1% 50.6% 69.6% 37.6% 65.5% 36.9% 2011 4/4 2.3 3.3 57.5% 51.2% 47.0% 50.9% 31.8% 48.6% 37.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 2.0 3.5 48.3% 65.6% 45.5% 59.7% 37.5% 55.3% 33.3%
27 2015 11/11 7.3 4.5 62.0% 72.0% 51.2% 51.1% 35.3% 64.2% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 4/4 6.5 2.3 68.6% 65.9% 50.7% 76.7% 55.0% 61.0% 31.2% 2014 3/3 7.0 6.3 58.6% 65.9% 42.8% 56.0% 39.1% 57.1% 36.0%
29 2017 10/10 6.6 2.4 65.3% 68.5% 53.9% 53.6% 31.4% 63.1% 32.1% 2015 3/3 3.0 2.0 54.3% 73.4% 51.6% 60.4% 27.4% 63.6% 33.7%
30 2018 19/19 5.8 3.2 65.4% 66.5% 47.0% 59.4% 38.4% 59.9% 33.4% 2016 7/7 3.7 2.3 59.7% 67.9% 49.1% 60.9% 45.9% 60.3% 38.6%
31 2019 2/2 0.5 1.5 65.5% 57.5% 42.9% 48.7% 25.0% 52.5% 28.0% 2017 7/7 5.4 4.3 63.3% 66.6% 45.0% 65.0% 48.5% 58.8% 36.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 2/2 4.0 3.0 61.7% 71.7% 53.9% 75.0% 40.0% 65.0% 38.4%
Career — 72/72 6.3 3.2 64.2% 69.0% 49.1% 60.0% 38.6% 61.9% 33.2% — 30/30 4.1 3.3 58.8% 65.9% 46.7% 59.4% 42.0% 58.0% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ruben Bemelmans Vincent Millot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2009 1500 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1501 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1597 122.5 +0.88 -0.33 0.848 47.3% +32 — — 38.5% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 2008 1489 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1634 112.3 +0.10 -0.35 0.931 49.4% — — +60 46.2% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05 2009 1552 113.9 -0.25 -0.27 0.652 42.1% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.11
24 2012 1648 118.1 -1.91 -0.07 0.901 48.3% -38 — +135 40.0% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.13 2010 1512 105.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1638 125.5 +0.65 0.00 1.070 51.5% +20 — — 42.9% +0.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.14 2011 1556 110.6 -4.22 -1.29 0.733 43.2% — -17 — 16.7% -2.58 0–1 1–0 — +0.06
26 2014 1628 113.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1617 112.5 -1.79 +0.22 0.745 45.0% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — -0.06
27 2015 1695 124.5 -1.03 -1.29 0.860 47.4% +26 — — 27.6% -1.28 0–2 2–4 (33%) — -0.88 2013 1576 107.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1646 110.6 -0.49 -2.17 0.800 48.0% +6 — — 46.2% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.19 2014 1581 116.8 -0.17 -0.69 0.839 46.1% +36 — — 30.0% -0.70 1–0 0–1 — -0.05
29 2017 1694 125.7 -0.20 -0.85 0.870 48.1% -61 — +90 41.9% -0.45 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.25 2015 1633 115.7 -0.56 -0.76 0.927 48.1% — — — 30.0% -0.80 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.09
30 2018 1686 128.9 -2.91 -1.28 0.833 47.2% -22 — +111 35.2% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.61 2016 1616 119.9 -1.70 -0.25 0.974 49.8% +7 — — 50.0% +0.17 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
31 2019 1590 108.5 -1.92 +0.26 0.590 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.40 — — — -0.16 2017 1654 114.6 -2.09 -0.35 0.891 48.3% +3 — — 40.9% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +0.43
32 2020 1599 107.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1654 106.9 -1.58 -0.37 1.097 52.1% — — — 100.0% +3.50 — — — 0.00
33 2021 1552 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1518 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1756 123.9 -1.13 -0.82 0.871 48.0% -8 — +101 37.3% -0.70 9–20 (31%) 15–23 (39%) 89.1 -2.74 — 1682 118.4 -1.76 -0.49 0.865 47.4% +10 -17 — 36.6% -0.82 4–10 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 90.3 +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.