H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo vs Eric Prodon H2H: 1-1

Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo and Eric Prodon are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2006 Argentina Open round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Eric Prodon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #93 3-6 6-4 6-2 Eric Prodon #612 Match data Feb 16, 2006* R32 Argentina Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Eric Prodon #229 7-6(5) 6-2 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #143 Match data Apr 10, 2003* R32 Casablanca ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #1,153 #50 826 1,704 68 133 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eric Prodon #891 #83 623 1,566 1 19 5.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Eric Prodon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,537 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #235 1,544 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #325 1,521 0 0
23 2001 1–1 50.0% #154 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2002 0–3 0.0% #141 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2003 5–11 31.2% #80 1,477 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #633 1,484 0 0
26 2004 7–19 26.9% #130 1,448 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2005 5–5 50.0% #120 1,499 0 0 2008 0–4 0.0% #168 1,451 0 0
28 2006 25–20 55.6% #57 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2007 9–18 33.3% #133 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2008 1–6 14.3% #121 1,569 0 0 2011 0–3 0.0% #97 1,506 0 0
31 2009 4–10 28.6% #156 1,584 0 0 2012 0–7 0.0% #288 1,462 0 0
32 2010 1–4 20.0% #77 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2011 5–15 25.0% #130 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2012 3–12 20.0% #91 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2013 2–6 25.0% #166 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2014 0–3 0.0% #224 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Eric Prodon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2001 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 29 36 19.4% 61 94 155 39.4% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 16 17 5.9% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 192/196 of Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo's and 20/20 of Eric Prodon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Eric Prodon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.3% 59.5% 50.0% 46.2% 50.0% 56.4% 34.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 0.0 8.0 57.1% 58.3% 47.2% 70.6% — 53.6% 14.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/3 2.7 1.3 61.1% 62.9% 37.6% 52.0% 46.7% 53.3% 31.2%
25 2003 16/16 4.5 3.1 60.8% 67.7% 46.4% 48.6% 50.7% 59.1% 39.0% 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 65.5% 65.5% 55.2% 66.7% 20.0% 61.9% 37.5%
26 2004 25/26 2.2 3.6 57.9% 66.1% 46.0% 58.2% 34.5% 57.6% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 10/10 1.8 1.6 61.2% 66.2% 52.9% 44.7% 42.7% 61.5% 38.1% 2008 4/4 4.3 2.0 58.6% 70.8% 46.4% 46.4% 8.3% 60.7% 25.6%
28 2006 44/45 4.2 2.4 59.1% 70.0% 46.7% 56.8% 45.3% 60.5% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 25/27 2.9 4.9 55.2% 65.2% 43.6% 52.4% 60.3% 55.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 7/7 1.7 4.6 53.1% 66.9% 43.3% 51.5% 40.4% 55.7% 39.0% 2011 3/3 2.3 5.7 55.0% 57.2% 39.8% 50.1% 38.9% 49.1% 35.3%
31 2009 14/14 2.4 5.1 55.3% 67.0% 45.5% 62.4% 38.6% 57.2% 36.2% 2012 7/7 4.3 2.0 60.7% 57.9% 47.9% 56.8% 25.4% 53.9% 28.9%
32 2010 5/5 3.4 3.2 58.2% 68.7% 41.4% 48.3% 29.2% 57.3% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 20/20 2.5 4.4 55.9% 63.8% 44.8% 53.5% 47.8% 55.3% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 15/15 2.7 5.2 53.7% 66.8% 46.2% 49.3% 37.1% 57.2% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 8/8 4.3 4.1 53.9% 71.8% 47.5% 61.8% 36.2% 60.3% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 3/3 0.7 3.7 50.9% 60.3% 45.5% 47.8% 47.2% 53.6% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 192/201 3.1 3.7 57.1% 67.1% 45.9% 54.2% 44.4% 58.0% 36.8% — 20/20 3.4 2.9 59.9% 61.6% 45.3% 53.6% 26.9% 54.9% 29.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo Eric Prodon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1538 112.4 +0.06 -4.15 0.779 45.5% — — — 25.0% -0.75 — — — +0.11
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1527 101.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1545 107.1 +3.66 +3.59 0.313 37.0% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.29
22 2000 1482 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1522 94.2 -1.58 -3.41 0.669 43.5% — +57 — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.69
23 2001 1492 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.09 2004 1510 99.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2002 1497 110.2 — — — — — +38 — 25.0% -2.12 0–2 — — -0.52 2005 1498 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 1478 114.0 -1.75 -0.48 0.954 48.8% -2 +54 — 40.5% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.83 2006 1484 100.9 +1.00 -1.59 0.984 48.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.06
26 2004 1448 112.1 -4.06 -3.50 0.792 46.1% -24 +58 — 33.8% -1.28 2–5 (29%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1500 117.9 -0.46 -0.04 0.991 49.6% — +55 — 50.0% +0.05 — 1–0 — -0.16 2008 1452 100.7 -2.45 -3.09 0.653 44.3% — +27 — 0.0% -2.11 — 0–2 — +0.23
28 2006 1665 136.3 -0.89 +0.15 0.983 50.1% -205 +93 — 51.8% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.23 2009 1463 103.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1546 122.6 -4.46 +0.12 0.860 47.2% -108 +96 — 38.8% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.16 2010 1452 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1570 121.0 -2.71 +1.08 0.881 47.6% — +67 — 33.3% -0.87 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05 2011 1506 118.5 -0.68 -0.17 0.692 42.2% — — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 2009 1585 117.3 -3.43 -1.01 0.847 47.1% -183 +83 — 33.3% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.21 2012 1463 107.5 -4.17 -3.50 0.625 42.5% — +29 — 11.1% -2.61 — 1–0 — -0.09
32 2010 1571 118.8 -1.59 -2.39 0.781 46.7% — +106 — 18.2% -1.27 — 0–2 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1532 118.2 -5.08 -1.56 0.798 46.2% -132 +68 — 31.4% -1.35 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.81 2014 1475 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1571 127.4 -3.34 -2.07 0.818 46.7% -103 +25 -145 27.5% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 1568 119.9 -1.67 -1.61 0.864 47.7% — +36 — 38.9% -0.67 0–2 1–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1620 118.9 -2.17 -1.23 0.744 44.3% — +60 — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1603 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2016 1605 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1528 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1705 127.1 -2.77 -0.95 0.877 47.8% -121 +72 -145 38.5% -0.80 19–41 (32%) 29–35 (45%) 92.4 +1.01 — 1566 109.0 -2.05 -2.49 0.655 43.2% — +35 — 13.5% -2.27 0–2 2–3 (40%) — +2.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.