H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 0-1
Robby Ginepri holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robby Ginepri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robby Ginepri won the 2004 Miami Masters first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2004* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-2 6-2 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |