H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 2-0
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo holds a 2–0 lead over Somdev Devvarman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2013 Houston third round 7-6(5) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2013* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |