H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Russell Simpson vs Mike Cahill H2H: 1-2
Mike Cahill holds a 2–1 lead over Russell Simpson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mike Cahill leads 2–0 on clay, while Russell Simpson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Russell Simpson won the 1979 Atlanta fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 72
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1979* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Russell Simpson | 6-3 6-1 | Mike Cahill | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1976* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mike Cahill | 6-2 6-3 | Russell Simpson | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1975* | Calcutta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mike Cahill | 6-2 6-2 | Russell Simpson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell Simpson | #1,013 | #47 | 0 | 1,765 | 131 | 195 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Russell Simpson | Mike Cahill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #318 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #183 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #126 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #108 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #133 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #76 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #96 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #180 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |