H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-1

Sam Querrey and Lukas Lacko are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 1–0 on clay, while Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sam Querrey #20 6-3 6-4 6-4 Lukas Lacko #77 Match data May 29, 2013* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Lukas Lacko #113 7-6(6) 6-3 Sam Querrey #17 Match data Feb 10, 2011* R32 San Jose ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,038 372 316 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,637 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2008 28–24 53.8% #39 1,778 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,900 0 2 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,817 0 6 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,875 0 7 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,896 0 7 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,812 0 7 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,797 0 8 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,944 0 10 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,823 0 10 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,818 0 10 — — — — — — —
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,689 0 10 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,644 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sam Querrey Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2008 23 16 39 59.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 30 14 44 68.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2010 19 14 33 57.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2013 21 14 35 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 16 14 30 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2015 8 15 23 34.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2017 23 13 36 63.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2018 16 16 32 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 250 210 460 54.3% 44 57 101 43.6% 78 47 125 62.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 684/688 of Sam Querrey's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sam Querrey Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2006 17/17 11.4 3.2 57.2% 75.9% 49.8% 62.8% 42.9% 64.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 41/41 12.4 3.2 56.6% 79.2% 48.3% 59.9% 39.4% 65.8% 33.9% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2008 51/52 10.2 3.2 59.1% 74.3% 49.1% 61.1% 41.2% 64.2% 35.5% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2009 61/61 11.8 3.0 59.4% 80.0% 53.4% 60.4% 44.4% 69.2% 36.2% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2010 56/56 12.3 3.4 61.5% 79.4% 50.9% 64.4% 45.2% 68.3% 35.1% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2011 25/25 8.9 3.2 59.6% 74.8% 51.2% 66.6% 31.2% 65.2% 34.4% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2012 61/61 11.6 3.9 57.6% 80.5% 51.1% 60.0% 42.0% 68.1% 36.0% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2013 45/46 12.8 3.6 59.6% 78.6% 48.7% 57.6% 35.7% 66.5% 33.6% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2014 45/46 14.4 2.8 60.5% 79.4% 51.9% 73.7% 41.8% 68.7% 33.8% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2015 44/44 13.8 3.6 59.5% 78.7% 54.4% 64.0% 37.1% 68.9% 33.7% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2016 51/51 13.1 3.1 58.6% 79.9% 52.3% 59.4% 39.6% 68.5% 33.4% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2017 55/55 13.5 3.2 57.1% 79.8% 51.8% 62.5% 49.5% 67.9% 37.0% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2018 43/43 14.3 3.7 58.2% 81.9% 51.7% 60.0% 41.2% 69.3% 34.2% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2019 41/41 16.8 4.0 62.1% 81.2% 49.4% 60.5% 33.2% 69.1% 33.8% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2020 9/9 16.8 3.6 60.3% 78.2% 50.8% 33.4% 31.7% 67.5% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 25/26 15.2 5.2 56.8% 81.9% 47.7% 52.4% 33.2% 67.3% 30.3% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2022 14/14 12.4 4.7 58.3% 78.6% 46.1% 56.3% 26.6% 64.8% 29.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 684/688 12.9 3.5 59.0% 79.2% 50.9% 61.3% 40.2% 67.6% 34.5% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sam Querrey Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2005 1490 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1542 124.2 +1.62 -2.01 0.962 49.2% -13 — — 46.7% -0.31 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) 94.5 -0.03 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1637 141.5 +2.16 -1.29 0.990 50.0% +50 -158 — 47.6% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 9–10 (47%) 98.4 +0.09 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2008 1779 145.5 +1.02 -0.70 0.993 50.1% +29 -209 -254 51.5% +0.04 11–8 (58%) 9–8 (53%) 103.2 +0.64 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2009 1900 149.0 +4.79 +0.01 1.176 52.3% +27 -361 -223 62.0% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 13–12 (52%) 97.3 +1.27 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2010 1873 152.2 +3.95 -0.55 1.108 51.9% +5 -250 +9 58.4% +0.58 13–11 (54%) 14–17 (45%) 102.5 +2.65 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) 101.4 -0.83
23 2011 1817 141.7 +1.37 -1.06 0.989 49.9% +19 -173 +81 46.7% -0.10 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 95.5 +0.50 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.1 -0.54
24 2012 2006 157.4 +4.09 +0.39 1.129 52.1% +3 -305 -92 57.8% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 20–13 (61%) 105.3 -0.61 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 -0.47
25 2013 1875 153.6 +2.58 -2.07 1.003 50.0% +71 -164 -51 50.0% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 95.5 +0.18 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 -0.64
26 2014 1896 144.5 +3.69 -2.25 1.080 51.0% +17 -178 -23 56.4% +0.33 6–9 (40%) 12–12 (50%) 94.1 +0.27 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.19
27 2015 1812 152.4 +3.52 -1.09 1.082 51.0% -39 -68 +110 46.7% -0.02 7–9 (44%) 13–18 (42%) 96.7 -2.68 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.16
28 2016 1797 152.8 +4.13 -1.97 1.060 50.9% -38 -84 +223 56.0% +0.27 8–9 (47%) 18–16 (53%) 100.2 +1.80 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2017 1945 161.8 +4.11 +1.06 1.153 52.3% -43 -192 +131 59.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 14–13 (52%) 107.0 +1.92 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2018 1823 152.3 +4.08 -0.93 1.114 51.7% -5 -127 +252 54.1% +0.58 6–11 (35%) 9–20 (31%) 90.6 +1.23 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +1.00
31 2019 1898 146.9 +4.59 -1.49 1.095 51.3% -82 -158 +201 55.6% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 18–15 (55%) 100.8 -0.90 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2020 1818 128.8 +2.33 -0.47 0.956 48.3% -33 — — 37.0% -0.67 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.60 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1690 124.0 +2.41 -3.84 0.926 48.7% -54 — +303 39.1% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 8–8 (50%) 95.2 -0.24 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2022 1645 117.4 -0.20 -3.77 0.835 47.4% -72 — +250 28.6% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 +0.03 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2039 155.6 +3.33 -1.02 1.064 51.0% 0 -181 +77 53.2% +0.22 112–123 (48%) 184–198 (48%) 96.0 +0.81 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.